© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

Build a portfolio from scratch — the page previews it live

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

No percentile overlays — plain values and bars

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Other

Composite

Peer Group

Expense Ratio
0.59%
#NameTickerAUM
1PIMCO Short-Term FundPFTCX$10.9B
2Stone Ridge High Yield Reinsurance Risk Premium FundSHRIX$5B
3Alerian MLP Index ETNs due January 28, 2044AMJB$807M
4PIMCO Short-Term PortfolioVPVSTAD$681M
5Federated Hermes Capital Income FundCAPAX$658M
6MicroSectors FANG+ ETNsFNGS$617M
7Invesco CurrencyShares Japanese Yen TrustFXY$460M
8Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish FundUUP$431M
9Invesco CurrencyShares Swiss Franc TrustFXF$375M
10Invesco CurrencyShares Euro TrustFXE$330M
Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
Peer Group
3.7%3.7%5.6%-0.01-3.9%
ⓘ Methodology

Peer composites equal-weight the group's share-class representatives' daily returns, including delisted members' alive-era history via the frozen year-end snapshots — though our coverage of closed funds is partial, so composite levels at older dates may run slightly high. Membership is the latest known — style migrators carry their full history. ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
Peer Group
2.5%-0.4%-0.3%-0.9%1.1%4.0%3.7%6.0%8.1%3.5%6.8%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
Peer Group
62.6%-32.9%46.4%22.8%-9.5%-5.0%-6.7%26.7%15.4%-0.2%-7.0%29.2%35.8%3.5%-5.7%13.1%19.2%17.3%15.0%13.4%-2.1%2.2%-15.3%23.1%12.5%2.7%9.3%6.0%-12.3%14.3%6.8%0.6%4.9%6.6%2.8%-1.8%2.5%6.1%2.8%10.7%10.1%6.6%-8.0%5.6%4.9%11.6%2.5%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
Global Dev
Peer Group
-2.9%0.35**-0.060.05-0.06-0.02-0.04-0.08*0.61226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Global Dev factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). Fama-French publishes daily factors for developed markets only, so Dev Ex-US is developed markets excluding the US and Global Dev is developed markets including it; emerging markets, a small share of world market capitalization, are not covered by the source data. From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

Factor History

Other Composite

No metrics selected — use Add metric to chart factors over time.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Type
72% ETF, 28% Mutual Fund
Asset Class
88% , 8% , 4%
Peer Asset Class
Other
Region
62% , 23% , 15%
Peer Group
Other (25 peers)
Expense Ratio
0.59%
Median Member AUM
$103M
Yield
2.48%
Inception
7/25/1983
Holdings (Reported)
4,581
Turnover
0%
Equity
0%
Derivatives
0%
ⓘ Methodology

Every figure on this card is an equal-weight aggregate over the composite's share-class-deduped members: the median across the members reporting each field, blank where too few of them do. Three rows depart from that, because a median of them would say nothing: Inception is the group's OLDEST member — where its combined history can start; 3Y Flow is the group's own net flow over its own assets, not the middle member's rate; and Type, Asset Class and Region are compositions by member count. Holdings is the merged look-through book — distinct positions across the members' holdings.

Composite Factors

Not scored — PEER:Other’s holdings don’t clear the coverage floor for composite factor scores.

Factor Details

None of the selected metrics are scored for PEER:Other — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Asset Class Exposure

Equity8.0%
Fixed Income23.4%
Cash & Short-Term39.3%
Other9.4%
No Holdings Data20.0%
Short positions of 13.4% of net assets are not shown.ⓘ Methodology

Shares of the fund's long book, from the asset category each position is filed under. Holdings that are themselves funds are looked through one level to their own mix (4% of the book). Cash & Short-Term includes 0.5% of net assets the filing does not itemise. The short book is stated under the card and never netted into a slice: a pie cannot draw a negative, and folding a hedge into the class it offsets would make it look like more of that class. 20.0% of this book sits in funds we hold no holdings file for and is drawn as its own slice. Other is everything we could not name as an asset class: holdings the filing itself labels as other, derivative positions at the market value the filing reports rather than at notional, and funds held inside this fund whose own holdings we could not read (0.1% here). Alternatives holds funds counted by what they are rather than by what they hold - alternative strategies, and funds that are short. A pie cannot draw a negative, and adding a hedge to the class it offsets would make it look like more of that class.

Country Exposure

Level

Based on holdings that carry a country (35% of total assets).

United States75.9%
United States72.0%
Other4.0%
Developed Ex-US16.1%
Switzerland1.9%
United Kingdom1.2%
Ireland1.1%
Other11.9%
Emerging Markets8.0%
China1.9%
Brazil1.0%
Other5.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

10 of 25 funds (top 10 shown, create for all 25)

#NameTickerWeight %AUM
1PIMCO Short-Term FundPFTCX
4.00
$10.9B
2Stone Ridge High Yield Reinsurance Risk Premium FundSHRIX
4.00
$5B
3Alerian MLP Index ETNs due January 28, 2044AMJB
4.00
$807M
4PIMCO Short-Term PortfolioVPVSTAD
4.00
$681M
5Federated Hermes Capital Income FundCAPAX
4.00
$658M
6MicroSectors FANG+ ETNsFNGS
4.00
$617M
7Invesco CurrencyShares Japanese Yen TrustFXY
4.00
$460M
8Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish FundUUP
4.00
$431M
9Invesco CurrencyShares Swiss Franc TrustFXF
4.00
$375M
10Invesco CurrencyShares Euro TrustFXE
4.00
$330M
ⓘ Methodology

The funds this composite is made of, each counting once (100 ÷ 10 — the same equal weighting behind its returns and its median exposures), listed largest first by assets. Tick Look-Through to expand them into the stocks they hold. Holdings Concentration beside this card always describes that looked-through book, not this list — it is a statement about exposure, not about the roster. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Concentration

Total Holdings4,581
Effective Holdings75.8
Top 10 Weight16.6%
Max Position3.3%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)0%
Top Country (of Net Assets)72%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Every row on this card describes the composite's merged look-through book — the stocks its members hold — not the list of member funds, whatever the Holdings card is showing.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups

Other is an asset class — the widest pool this card ranks in — so there is no larger group to rank it against. Its members’ standings live on their own pages, and the narrower groups inside it are each ranked here against Other.

ⓘ Methodology

Other Composite is a Sparkline peer composite — its members are the share-class representatives of the funds in the group (one class per fund: the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class).