© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

Build a portfolio from scratch — the page previews it live

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

No percentile overlays — plain values and bars

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Other

Composite

Peer Asset Class

Expense Ratio
0.45%
#NameTickerAUM
1PIMCO Short-Term FundPFTCX$10.9B
2Stone Ridge High Yield Reinsurance Risk Premium FundSHRIX$5B
3JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Growth ETFLGDS$1.2B
4Alpha Architect US Equity 4 ETFAAUB$852M
5Alerian MLP Index ETNs due January 28, 2044AMJB$807M
6PIMCO Short-Term PortfolioVPVSTAD$681M
7Federated Hermes Capital Income FundCAPAX$658M
8The Investment House ETFTIH$646M
9BNY Mellon Global Fixed Income ETFBGFI$634M
10MicroSectors FANG+ ETNsFNGS$617M
Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
Peer Asset Class
4.6%4.6%7.8%0.10-4.8%
ⓘ Methodology

Peer composites equal-weight the group's share-class representatives' daily returns, including delisted members' alive-era history via the frozen year-end snapshots — though our coverage of closed funds is partial, so composite levels at older dates may run slightly high. Membership is the latest known — style migrators carry their full history. ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
Peer Asset Class
3.3%-0.7%0.8%-0.6%-0.1%4.8%4.6%6.4%8.4%3.6%6.8%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
Peer Asset Class
62.6%-32.9%46.4%22.8%-9.5%-5.0%-6.7%26.7%15.4%-0.2%-7.0%29.2%35.8%3.5%-5.7%13.1%19.2%17.3%15.0%13.4%-2.1%2.2%-15.3%23.1%12.5%2.7%9.3%6.0%-12.3%14.3%6.8%0.6%4.9%6.6%2.8%-1.8%2.5%6.1%2.8%10.7%10.1%6.6%-8.0%5.6%4.9%11.6%3.3%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
Global Dev
Peer Asset Class
-3.8%0.38**-0.18**0.03-0.32**-0.06-0.02-0.070.71226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Global Dev factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). Fama-French publishes daily factors for developed markets only, so Dev Ex-US is developed markets excluding the US and Global Dev is developed markets including it; emerging markets, a small share of world market capitalization, are not covered by the source data. From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

Factor History

Other Composite

No metrics selected — use Add metric to chart factors over time.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Type
96% ETF, 4% Mutual Fund
Asset Class
98% , 1% , 1%
Peer Asset Class
Other
Region
62% , 23% , 15%
Expense Ratio
0.45%
Median Member AUM
$10M
Inception
7/25/1983
Holdings (Reported)
4,581
Turnover
0%
ⓘ Methodology

Every figure on this card is an equal-weight aggregate over the composite's share-class-deduped members: the median across the members reporting each field, blank where too few of them do. Three rows depart from that, because a median of them would say nothing: Inception is the group's OLDEST member — where its combined history can start; 3Y Flow is the group's own net flow over its own assets, not the middle member's rate; and Type, Asset Class and Region are compositions by member count. Holdings is the merged look-through book — distinct positions across the members' holdings.

Composite Factors

Not scored — UNIV:Other’s holdings don’t clear the coverage floor for composite factor scores.

Factor Details

None of the selected metrics are scored for UNIV:Other — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

10 of 121 funds (top 10 shown, create for all 121)

#NameTickerWeight %AUM
1PIMCO Short-Term FundPFTCX
0.83
$10.9B
2Stone Ridge High Yield Reinsurance Risk Premium FundSHRIX
0.83
$5B
3JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Growth ETFLGDS
0.83
$1.2B
4Alpha Architect US Equity 4 ETFAAUB
0.83
$852M
5Alerian MLP Index ETNs due January 28, 2044AMJB
0.83
$807M
6PIMCO Short-Term PortfolioVPVSTAD
0.83
$681M
7Federated Hermes Capital Income FundCAPAX
0.83
$658M
8The Investment House ETFTIH
0.83
$646M
9BNY Mellon Global Fixed Income ETFBGFI
0.83
$634M
10MicroSectors FANG+ ETNsFNGS
0.83
$617M
ⓘ Methodology

The funds this composite is made of, each counting once (100 ÷ 10 — the same equal weighting behind its returns and its median exposures), listed largest first by assets. Tick Look-Through to expand them into the stocks they hold. Holdings Concentration beside this card always describes that looked-through book, not this list — it is a statement about exposure, not about the roster. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Concentration

Total Holdings4,581
Effective Holdings75.8
Top 10 Weight3.4%
Max Position0.7%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)0%
Top Country (of Net Assets)0%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Every row on this card describes the composite's merged look-through book — the stocks its members hold — not the list of member funds, whatever the Holdings card is showing.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups

Other is an asset class — the widest pool this card ranks in — so there is no larger group to rank it against. Its members’ standings live on their own pages, and the narrower groups inside it are each ranked here against Other.

ⓘ Methodology

Other Composite is a Sparkline peer composite — its members are the share-class representatives of the funds in the group (one class per fund: the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class).