© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

Build a portfolio from scratch — the page previews it live

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

No percentile overlays — plain values and bars

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

New Listings

Composite

Peer Group

Expense Ratio
0.40%
#NameTickerAUM
1JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Growth ETFLGDS$1.2B
2Alpha Architect US Equity 4 ETFAAUB$852M
3The Investment House ETFTIH$646M
4BNY Mellon Global Fixed Income ETFBGFI$634M
5RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETFRJCA$607M
6SEI Ang Research Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETFANGU$460M
7Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETFEUV$448M
8Main Active Rotation ETFSECA$443M
9EA Bridgeway Select Small-Cap Value ETFBRSV$295M
10Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETFLYTE$233M
Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
Peer Group
3.7%4.9%10.9%0.14-6.1%
ⓘ Methodology

Peer composites equal-weight the group's share-class representatives' daily returns, including delisted members' alive-era history via the frozen year-end snapshots — though our coverage of closed funds is partial, so composite levels at older dates may run slightly high. Membership is the latest known — style migrators carry their full history. Composite history is thinly covered where fewer than 5 funds reported — New Listings Composite before 5/7/2026.ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 1/5/2026 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
Peer Group
4.4%-0.8%1.0%-0.5%-0.5%6.5%4.4%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
YTD
Peer Group
4.4%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
US
Peer Group
-4.2%0.37**0.060.12-0.24**-0.17**-0.02-0.060.54165
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 1/5/2026 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Type
ETF
Asset Class
Other
Peer Group
New Listings (167 peers)
Expense Ratio
0.40%
Median Member AUM
$6M
Inception
5/7/2026
Holdings (Reported)
0
Turnover
0%
ⓘ Methodology

Every figure on this card is an equal-weight aggregate over the composite's share-class-deduped members: the median across the members reporting each field, blank where too few of them do. Three rows depart from that, because a median of them would say nothing: Inception is the group's OLDEST member — where its combined history can start; 3Y Flow is the group's own net flow over its own assets, not the middle member's rate; and Type, Asset Class and Region are compositions by member count. Holdings is the median member's position count.

Composite Factors

Not scored — PEER:New Listings’s holdings don’t clear the coverage floor for composite factor scores.

Factor Details

None of the selected metrics are scored for PEER:New Listings — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

10 of 96 funds (top 10 shown, create for all 96)

#NameTickerWeight %AUM
1JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Growth ETFLGDS
1.04
$1.2B
2Alpha Architect US Equity 4 ETFAAUB
1.04
$852M
3The Investment House ETFTIH
1.04
$646M
4BNY Mellon Global Fixed Income ETFBGFI
1.04
$634M
5RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETFRJCA
1.04
$607M
6SEI Ang Research Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETFANGU
1.04
$460M
7Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETFEUV
1.04
$448M
8Main Active Rotation ETFSECA
1.04
$443M
9EA Bridgeway Select Small-Cap Value ETFBRSV
1.04
$295M
10Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETFLYTE
1.04
$233M
ⓘ Methodology

The funds this composite is made of, each counting once (100 ÷ 10 — the same equal weighting behind its returns and its median exposures), listed largest first by assets. Tick Look-Through to expand them into the stocks they hold. Holdings Concentration beside this card always describes that looked-through book, not this list — it is a statement about exposure, not about the roster. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Concentration

Total Holdings0
Top Sector (of Net Assets)0%
Top Country (of Net Assets)0%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None).

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
New Listings Composite
167 funds
Peer Asset Class
192 funds
YTD Return
-0.34%-0.23%49
1Y Return
--
3Y Return (Ann.)
--
5Y Return (Ann.)
--
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.40%0.45%51
ⓘ Methodology

New Listings Composite is a Sparkline peer composite — its members are the share-class representatives of the funds in the group (one class per fund: the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class). This card ranks it against its asset class, Other, which is the only pool a composite has: there is no peer group of peer groups, and the region tier is a fund-level grouping. Typical Member rows are medians across those representatives — the value is the group’s median, and the percentile is the median of the members’ own ranks within Other, so both describe the middle fund rather than the group as a whole. Quartile chips fill the layer the rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). A dash is a window the group is younger than, or one too few Other funds have a history for to rank against — hover it for which.