© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

Build a portfolio from scratch — the page previews it live

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

No percentile overlays — plain values and bars

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Commodities - Energy

Composite

Peer Group

Expense Ratio
0.89%
#NameTickerAUM
1United States Oil Fund LPUSO$1.7B
2United States Brent Oil Fund LPBNO$646M
3United States Natural Gas Fund LPUNG$458M
4Invesco DB Oil FundDBO$258M
5ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETFOILK$238M
6United States Gasoline Fund LPUGA$190M
7KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETFKRBN$138M
8Invesco DB Energy FundDBE$120M
9KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETFKCCA$117M
10United States 12 Month Oil Fund LPUSL$48M
Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
Peer Group
42.8%42.8%25.1%1.55-14.9%
ⓘ Methodology

Peer composites equal-weight the group's share-class representatives' daily returns, including delisted members' alive-era history via the frozen year-end snapshots — though our coverage of closed funds is partial, so composite levels at older dates may run slightly high. Membership is the latest known — style migrators carry their full history. ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
Peer Group
49.0%-0.1%1.1%3.3%17.9%13.1%42.8%18.5%10.7%10.3%-3.4%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
20062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
Peer Group
-24.1%*20.8%-45.2%21.8%-8.4%-6.1%-4.8%7.6%-38.2%-35.7%16.5%-2.8%-9.8%16.9%-33.5%70.7%27.5%-11.0%4.2%-4.0%49.0%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
US
Peer Group
37.2%-0.50*-0.90**0.61**-0.40*-0.22-0.10-0.100.21226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Type
ETF
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Commodities
Region
Peer Group Benchmark
Peer Group
Commodities - Energy (14 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
46
3Y Peer Percentile
46
Expense Ratio
0.89%
Median Member AUM
$129M
Yield
0.00%
Inception
4/11/2006
Holdings (Reported)
74
Turnover
0%
ⓘ Methodology

Every figure on this card is an equal-weight aggregate over the composite's share-class-deduped members: the median across the members reporting each field, blank where too few of them do. Three rows depart from that, because a median of them would say nothing: Inception is the group's OLDEST member — where its combined history can start; 3Y Flow is the group's own net flow over its own assets, not the middle member's rate; and Type, Asset Class and Region are compositions by member count. Holdings is the merged look-through book — distinct positions across the members' holdings.

Composite Factors

Not scored — PEER:Commodities - Energy’s holdings don’t clear the coverage floor for composite factor scores.

Factor Details

None of the selected metrics are scored for PEER:Commodities - Energy — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

10 of 14 funds (top 10 shown, create for all 14)

#NameTickerWeight %AUM
1United States Oil Fund LPUSO
7.14
$1.7B
2United States Brent Oil Fund LPBNO
7.14
$646M
3United States Natural Gas Fund LPUNG
7.14
$458M
4Invesco DB Oil FundDBO
7.14
$258M
5ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETFOILK
7.14
$238M
6United States Gasoline Fund LPUGA
7.14
$190M
7KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETFKRBN
7.14
$138M
8Invesco DB Energy FundDBE
7.14
$120M
9KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETFKCCA
7.14
$117M
10United States 12 Month Oil Fund LPUSL
7.14
$48M
ⓘ Methodology

The funds this composite is made of, each counting once (100 ÷ 10 — the same equal weighting behind its returns and its median exposures), listed largest first by assets. Tick Look-Through to expand them into the stocks they hold. Holdings Concentration beside this card always describes that looked-through book, not this list — it is a statement about exposure, not about the roster. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Concentration

Total Holdings74
Effective Holdings11.7
Top 10 Weight23.4%
Max Position7.1%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)0%
Top Country (of Net Assets)0%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Every row on this card describes the composite's merged look-through book — the stocks its members hold — not the list of member funds, whatever the Holdings card is showing.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
Commodities - Energy Composite
14 funds
Peer Asset Class
113 funds
YTD Return
64.81%19.73%93
1Y Return
63.40%24.77%93
3Y Return (Ann.)
16.52%17.14%42
5Y Return (Ann.)
15.20%11.86%63
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.89%0.71%36
ⓘ Methodology

Commodities - Energy Composite is a Sparkline peer composite — its members are the share-class representatives of the funds in the group (one class per fund: the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class). This card ranks it against its asset class, Commodities, which is the only pool a composite has: there is no peer group of peer groups, and the region tier is a fund-level grouping. Typical Member rows are medians across those representatives — the value is the group’s median, and the percentile is the median of the members’ own ranks within Commodities, so both describe the middle fund rather than the group as a whole. Quartile chips fill the layer the rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). A dash is a window the group is younger than, or one too few Commodities funds have a history for to rank against — hover it for which.