© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

OILK

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Commodities Funds · 113 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

OILK

ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF

Expense Ratio
0.70%
AUM
$238M
Inception
9/29/2016
1Y Return
+67.8%94th %ilevs 113 asset-class peers
·

The fund invests in financial instruments that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should track the performance of the index. The index is designed to measure the performance of three separate contract schedules for West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) Crude Oil futures.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF
67.8%67.8%31.0%2.06-21.2%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF
78.4%0.1%1.0%7.5%27.3%19.2%67.8%22.7%17.1%16.2%4.9%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF
10.1%*2.8%-20.4%30.5%-61.1%66.0%25.8%-1.0%8.2%-11.9%78.4%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
OILKUS
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF
52.1%-0.55-0.88**0.65**-0.34-0.13-0.07-0.140.16226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Fund Documents(opens the fund company’s site in a new tab)
Family
Registrant
Type
ETF
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Commodities
Region
Peer Group Benchmark
Prospectus Benchmark
Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index
Peer Group
Commodities - Energy (14 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
54
3Y Peer Percentile
50
Expense Ratio
0.70%
AUM
$238M
3Y Flow
+86.1%
Yield
12.14%
Inception
9/29/2016
Holdings (Reported)
8
Turnover
0%
Equity
0%
Derivatives
4%
Net Equity Exposure
0%
Strategy Summary

The fund invests in financial instruments that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should track the performance of the index. The index is designed to measure the performance of three separate contract schedules for West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) Crude Oil futures.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the SEC annual shareholder report (8/6/2026). Turnover from market data (10/6/2026). Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 5/31/2026. Summary may be from an older prospectus.

Factor DetailsRef: Commodities Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for OILK — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Commodities Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 5/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Country Exposure

Level

Based on holdings that carry a country (62% of total assets).

100.0%
100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 5/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

8 positions · 52.6% in funds

#NameTickerWeight %Country
1ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETFIQMM
52.58
USA
2Repurchase Agreement-
13.79
USA
3Repurchase Agreement-
8.68
USA
4Repurchase Agreement-
6.51
USA
5Repurchase Agreement-
4.77
USA
6--
4.28
USA
7--
3.03
USA
8--
-3.79
USA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. "In funds" adds up the rows tagged Fund — holdings that are themselves funds this app covers, which is what look-through can expand; a held vehicle that files no holdings of its own (a commodity or currency trust, a money-market fund) is not counted and stays a single line. Holdings as of 5/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Commodities Funds

Total Holdings8
Effective Holdings2.8
Top 10 Weight93.6%
Max Position52.6%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)94%
Top Country (of Net Assets)94%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Commodities Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 5/31/2026.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF
Peer Group
14 funds
Peer Asset Class
113 funds
YTD Return
78.41%64.81%5719.73%95
1Y Return
67.82%63.40%5424.77%94
3Y Return (Ann.)
17.14%16.52%5017.14%49
5Y Return (Ann.)
16.19%15.20%5511.86%70
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.70%0.89%860.71%52
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (14 share classes across 14 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity64
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Return Corr
FundPeer Group
1TTT
ProShares UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury
Inverse - Other
Inverse - Other
64---
2TBT
ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury
Inverse - Other
Inverse - Other
64---
3PST
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
Inverse - Other
Inverse - Other
64---
4TBX
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury
Inverse - Other
Inverse - Other
63---
5RINF
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF
Alts - Global Macro
Alts - Global Macro
63---
6DOG
ProShares Short Dow30
Inverse - Equity
Inverse - Equity
63---
7TBF
ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury
Inverse - Other
Inverse - Other
62---
8SRS
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate
Inverse - Equity
Inverse - Equity
62---
9EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
Inverse - Equity
Inverse - Equity
62---
10TWM
ProShares UltraShort Russell 2000
Inverse - Equity
Inverse - Equity
62---

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 5/31/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days).