© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

YCL

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Leveraged Funds · 749 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

YCL

Commodity PoolLeveraged

ProShares Ultra Yen

Expense Ratio
0.95%
AUM
$30M
Inception
11/26/2008
1Y Return
-11.9%41st %ilevs 749 asset-class peers

The fund seeks to meet its investment objective by investing under normal market conditions in any one of, or combinations of, Financial Instruments based on the fund’s benchmark. It will also hold cash or cash equivalents such as U.S. Treasury securities or other high credit quality, short-term fixed-income or similar securities as collateral for Financial Instruments and pending investment in Financial Instruments.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
YCL
ProShares Ultra Yen
-11.9%-11.9%16.3%-0.96-18.7%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
YCL
ProShares Ultra Yen
-5.0%-0.2%-0.8%-2.7%3.9%-0.1%-11.9%-11.7%-10.3%-18.6%-8.2%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
YCL
ProShares Ultra Yen
11.3%*-7.3%26.9%9.9%-19.6%-29.6%-24.6%-5.7%5.5%8.7%2.9%-3.0%7.2%-20.9%-26.9%-20.5%-26.0%-6.3%-5.0%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
YCLUS
ProShares Ultra Yen
-11.5%0.27*0.05-0.240.070.14-0.20-0.43**0.14226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund ProfileLeveraged

Family
Type
ETF
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Leveraged
Structure
Commodity Pool
Underlying
JPY/USD cross rate (2x long)
Peer Group
Leveraged - Other (46 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
55
3Y Peer Percentile
14
Expense Ratio
0.95%
AUM
$30M
Yield
0.00%
Inception
11/26/2008
Turnover
0%
Strategy Summary

The fund seeks to meet its investment objective by investing under normal market conditions in any one of, or combinations of, Financial Instruments based on the fund’s benchmark. It will also hold cash or cash equivalents such as U.S. Treasury securities or other high credit quality, short-term fixed-income or similar securities as collateral for Financial Instruments and pending investment in Financial Instruments.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio from the sponsor's website. Turnover from market data (10/6/2026). Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Summary may be from an older prospectus.

YCL is a commodity pool, not a registered fund, so it files no holdings report.

Factor DetailsRef: Leveraged Funds

YCL has no stock-level metrics. Fund-level metrics such as AUM and expense ratio are available in the picker.

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Leveraged Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
YCL
ProShares Ultra Yen
Peer Group
46 funds
Peer Asset Class
749 funds
YTD Return
-4.98%-19.47%71-10.88%55
1Y Return
-11.92%-14.52%55-0.94%41
3Y Return (Ann.)
-10.26%3.36%1424.24%7
5Y Return (Ann.)
-18.56%-0.65%206.79%7
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.95%0.95%480.99%55
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (56 share classes across 46 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Consensus Rank
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Factor Match
Top Return Corr
Top FF Match

Scanning every fund's holdings, factor profile and return history for matches with YCL… first view of a fund takes a few seconds.

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of those universe ranks (#1.0 = the top match on every method). A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Consensus Rank is simply the #1 row's figure, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Factor Similarity = 100 − a signature-weighted RMS gap across the composite factor scores (0–100 ranks within the clean equity fund universe), each axis weighted by how far this fund sits from the universe median of 50. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days). Fama-French Similarity = 1/(1+d), where d is the Euclidean distance between factor betas (market, size, value, profitability, investment, momentum, intangible value) from up to three years of daily returns (min 378 daily observations and regression R² of at least 0.25); 1.00 = identical loadings.