© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

Build a portfolio from scratch — the page previews it live

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

No percentile overlays — plain values and bars

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Leveraged

Composite

Peer Asset Class

Expense Ratio
0.99%
#NameTickerAUM
1ProShares UltraPro QQQTQQQ$37.9B
2Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X SharesSOXL$24B
3ProShares Ultra QQQQLD$15.1B
4ProShares Ultra S&P500SSO$8.4B
5Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X SharesSPXL$6.9B
6Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X SharesTECL$6.6B
7ProShares UltraPro S&P500UPRO$5.3B
8Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X SharesMUU$4.3B
9GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETFNVDL$3.8B
10Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X SharesTSLL$3.7B
Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
Peer Asset Class
-8.8%-8.8%53.4%-0.24-37.6%
ⓘ Methodology

Peer composites equal-weight the group's share-class representatives' daily returns, including delisted members' alive-era history via the frozen year-end snapshots — though our coverage of closed funds is partial, so composite levels at older dates may run slightly high. Membership is the latest known — style migrators carry their full history. ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
Peer Asset Class
11.7%-3.3%1.7%0.6%4.2%26.8%-8.8%21.1%31.3%12.3%9.9%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
Peer Asset Class
7.0%*-11.1%32.3%17.1%23.7%30.7%26.4%-14.0%-19.7%-30.1%46.9%15.0%8.4%15.2%6.2%-57.0%54.3%32.8%-8.0%23.2%36.7%12.5%-12.4%26.7%40.9%-21.0%50.4%15.7%29.0%-34.1%37.9%30.3%27.0%11.7%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
Global Dev
Peer Asset Class
-24.1%2.26**-0.93**0.01-2.97**-1.72**-0.24-0.55**0.89226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Global Dev factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). Fama-French publishes daily factors for developed markets only, so Dev Ex-US is developed markets excluding the US and Global Dev is developed markets including it; emerging markets, a small share of world market capitalization, are not covered by the source data. From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

Factor History

Leveraged Composite

No metrics selected — use Add metric to chart factors over time.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Type
93% ETF, 7% Mutual Fund
Asset Class
91% , 9%
Peer Asset Class
Leveraged
Region
89% , 4% , 4% , …
Expense Ratio
0.99%
Median Member AUM
$9M
Inception
7/12/1993
Holdings (Reported)
7,473
Turnover
0%
Equity
44%
Derivatives
10%
Net Equity Exposure
194%
ⓘ Methodology

Every figure on this card is an equal-weight aggregate over the composite's share-class-deduped members: the median across the members reporting each field, blank where too few of them do. Three rows depart from that, because a median of them would say nothing: Inception is the group's OLDEST member — where its combined history can start; 3Y Flow is the group's own net flow over its own assets, not the middle member's rate; and Type, Asset Class and Region are compositions by member count. Holdings is the merged look-through book — distinct positions across the members' holdings.

Composite Factors

Based on equity exposure only (47% of total assets).

Intangible Value60.5
Traditional Value38.4
Small-Cap33.1
Quality51.9
Momentum46.3
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Ranked within the clean equity fund universe, one entry per fund series (lowest: 0, highest: 100; the middle of the range is denser than the ends). Blue dots mark the fund's universe-normalized score; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. 351 of this group's 749 funds hold too little equity to count.

Factor Details

Based on equity exposure only (47% of total assets).

Valuation
Book-to-Price (NTM)19.8
Sales-to-Price (NTM)31.5
Earnings-to-Price (NTM)4.6
Innovation/IP
R&D / Mkt Cap1.6
Patents / Mkt Cap0.77
Brand
Sales & Marketing / Mkt Cap1.3
Trademarks / Mkt Cap0.05
Human Capital
PhD Employees / Mkt Cap3.5
Top University Alumni / Mkt Cap9.5
Politics
Lobbying Spend / Mkt Cap15.6
AI
AI Employees / Mkt Cap0.91
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. 351 of this group's 749 funds hold too little equity to count.

Asset Class Exposure

Equity68.9%
Fixed Income1.2%
Other2.7%
No Holdings Data27.2%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares of the fund's long book, from the asset category each position is filed under. 27.2% of this book sits in funds we hold no holdings file for and is drawn as its own slice. Other is everything we could not name as an asset class: holdings the filing itself labels as other, derivative positions at the market value the filing reports rather than at notional, and funds held inside this fund whose own holdings we could not read.

Country Exposure

Level

Based on holdings that carry a country (41% of total assets).

United States91.7%
United States91.2%
Other0.4%
Developed Ex-US4.7%
Emerging Markets3.6%
China2.0%
Other1.6%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Sector Exposure

Level

Based on equity exposure only (47% of total assets).

Technology42.3%
Financials13.8%
Industrials12.3%
Consumer Discretionary7.6%
Communication5.9%
Healthcare5.6%
Materials4.9%
Energy2.8%
Utilities1.9%
Real Estate1.8%
Consumer Staples1.2%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the fund's classified holdings — every position we can identify, with cash and unidentified positions excluded — not portfolio weights. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. 351 of this group's 749 funds hold too little equity to count.

Thematic Exposure

Based on equity exposure only (47% of total assets).

AI Composition

Infrastructure28.4%
Early Adopter27.9%
Laggard43.8%

Magnificent 7

Magnificent 712.2%
Non-Magnificent 787.8%

Old vs New Economy

Old Economy43.6%
New Economy56.4%

Globalization

Multinational48.5%
Exporter6.1%
Importer14.1%
Domestic31.3%

China Exposure

China/HK Domiciled0.6%
Revenue & Operations2.5%
Operations Only3.1%
Revenue Only0.9%
No Material Exposure18.4%

Company Size

Mega (>$500B)14.8%
Large ($70–500B)25.5%
Mid ($10–70B)31.0%
Small ($1–10B)28.1%
Micro (<$1B)0.6%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the fund's classified equity book, renormalized so each split sums to 100% (the equity book is 44% of net assets) — they are not portfolio weights. China exposure: domiciled = incorporated in China or Hong Kong, falling back to the filing's country for holdings outside the stock model. Among the rest, revenue = ≥15% of revenue derived from China; operations = ≥3% of LinkedIn-tracked workforce in China, or ≥2 identified Chinese suppliers making up ≥12% of those identified. China revenue is estimated where segment reporting is absent. Company size bands by holding market cap: Mega >$500B, Large $70–500B, Mid $10–70B, Small $1–10B, Micro <$1B. Old vs New Economy partitions Sparkline's 48 industries: New = technology, internet platforms and entertainment, e-commerce, payments, pharma/biotech/medtech, and renewable energy; Old = everything else. Shares are of classified holdings and sum to 100%. China shares are of total equity weight. Size shares are of scored holdings weight. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. 351 of this group's 749 funds hold too little equity to count.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

10 of 733 funds (top 10 shown, create for all 733)

#NameTickerWeight %AUM
1ProShares UltraPro QQQTQQQ
0.25
$37.9B
2Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X SharesSOXL
0.25
$24B
3ProShares Ultra QQQQLD
0.25
$15.1B
4ProShares Ultra S&P500SSO
0.25
$8.4B
5Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X SharesSPXL
0.25
$6.9B
6Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X SharesTECL
0.25
$6.6B
7ProShares UltraPro S&P500UPRO
0.25
$5.3B
8Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X SharesMUU
0.25
$4.3B
9GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETFNVDL
0.25
$3.8B
10Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X SharesTSLL
0.25
$3.7B
ⓘ Methodology

The funds this composite is made of, each counting once (100 ÷ 10 — the same equal weighting behind its returns and its median exposures), listed largest first by assets. Tick Look-Through to expand them into the stocks they hold. Holdings Concentration beside this card always describes that looked-through book, not this list — it is a statement about exposure, not about the roster. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Concentration

Total Holdings7,473
Effective Holdings33.7
Top 10 Weight37.8%
Max Position11.1%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)42%
Top Country (of Net Assets)96%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Every row on this card describes the composite's merged look-through book — the stocks its members hold — not the list of member funds, whatever the Holdings card is showing.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups

Leveraged is an asset class — the widest pool this card ranks in — so there is no larger group to rank it against. Its members’ standings live on their own pages, and the narrower groups inside it are each ranked here against Leveraged.

ⓘ Methodology

Leveraged Composite is a Sparkline peer composite — its members are the share-class representatives of the funds in the group (one class per fund: the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class).