© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

QTPI

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Fixed Income Funds · 2,838 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

QTPI

North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and

Expense Ratio
0.60%
AUM
$78M
Inception
12/20/2024
1Y Return
+0.3%64th %ilevs 2,838 asset-class peers
·

The fund invests at least 80% of net assets in preferred and debt securities eligible for favorable U.S. federal income tax treatment, including fixed rate, variable rate, and convertible preferred securities, as well as junior subordinated debt. It concentrates 25% or more of total assets in industries within the financial services sector, such as banking and insurance, while employing a proprietary quantitative credit screen to minimize default risk and optimize for relative value. The fund may also invest in restricted securities under Rule 144A and Regulation S.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
QTPI
North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and
0.3%0.3%4.4%-0.80-2.8%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
QTPI
North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and
-0.9%-0.7%-0.6%-2.2%-2.4%-1.0%0.3%3.7%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
20242025YTD
QTPI
North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and
0.3%*7.4%-0.9%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
QTPIGlobal Dev
North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and
-2.8%0.19**-0.20**0.03-0.17**0.01-0.09**-0.050.35226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Global Dev factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). Fama-French publishes daily factors for developed markets only, so Dev Ex-US is developed markets excluding the US and Global Dev is developed markets including it; emerging markets, a small share of world market capitalization, are not covered by the source data. From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Fund Documents(opens the fund company’s site in a new tab)
Family
Registrant
Type
ETF
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Fixed Income
Region
Peer Group Benchmark
Prospectus Benchmark
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index
Peer Group
Preferred Stock (54 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
61
Expense Ratio
0.60%
AUM
$78M
Yield
4.41%
Inception
12/20/2024
Holdings (Reported)
178
Turnover
22%
Equity
24%
Derivatives
0%
Net Equity Exposure
23%
Strategy Summary

The fund invests at least 80% of net assets in preferred and debt securities eligible for favorable U.S. federal income tax treatment, including fixed rate, variable rate, and convertible preferred securities, as well as junior subordinated debt. It concentrates 25% or more of total assets in industries within the financial services sector, such as banking and insurance, while employing a proprietary quantitative credit screen to minimize default risk and optimize for relative value. The fund may also invest in restricted securities under Rule 144A and Regulation S.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the fund's prospectus fee table. Turnover from the SEC annual report (8/10/2026). Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 5/31/2026. Strategy summary from the fund's prospectus.

Factor DetailsRef: Fixed Income Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for QTPI — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Fixed Income Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 5/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Asset Class Exposure

Fixed Income96.1%
Cash & Short-Term3.9%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares of the fund's long book, from the asset category each position is filed under. Cash & Short-Term includes 3.9% of net assets the filing does not itemise.

Country Exposure

Level
65.1%
65.0%
Other0.1%
34.5%
16.5%
10.0%
3.7%
2.2%
2.0%
Other0.1%
Other (1 region)0.4%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 5/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

56 positions (top 10 shown, create for full holdings)

#NameTickerWeight %SectorIndustryCountry
1Bank OF AmericaBAC
2.95
FinancialsMultinational BanksUSA
2Goldman Sachs Group Inc (the)GS
2.94
FinancialsInvest BankingUSA
3CitigroupC
2.93
FinancialsMultinational BanksUSA
4JP Morgan Chase & Company-
2.91
--USA
5Wells Fargo & CompanyWFC
2.88
FinancialsMultinational BanksUSA
6BP Capital Markets-
2.82
--GBR
7PNC Financial Services Group Inc (the)PNC
2.81
FinancialsNat'l & Regional BanksUSA
8US BancorpUSB
2.81
FinancialsMultinational BanksUSA
9Toronto Dominion Bank (the)-
2.76
--CAN
10Bank OF New York Mellon Corp (the)BNY
2.75
FinancialsInvestment ManagementUSA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. Holdings as of 5/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Fixed Income Funds

Total Holdings178
Effective Holdings44
Top 10 Weight28.6%
Max Position3.0%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)71%
Top Country (of Net Assets)62%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Fixed Income Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 5/31/2026.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
QTPI
North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and
Peer Group
54 funds
Peer Asset Class
2,838 funds
YTD Return
-0.88%-1.32%65-2.33%63
1Y Return
0.25%-1.24%61-1.51%64
3Y Return (Ann.)
---
5Y Return (Ann.)
---
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.60%0.56%350.52%43
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (87 share classes across 54 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity48
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Return Corr
Top FF Match
FundPeer Group
1PQDI
Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF
Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock
48----
2NPFD
Nuveen Variable Rate Preferred & Income Fund
Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock
48----
3NPFI
Nuveen Preferred and Income ETF
Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock
45----
4FPE
First Trust Preferred Securities and Income ETF
Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock
42----
5JPC
Nuveen Preferred & Income Opportunities Fund
Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock
42----
6FPEI
First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities and Income ETF
Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock
42----
7FPFD
Fidelity Preferred Securities and Income ETF
Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock
42----
8DFP
Flaherty & Crumrine Dynamic Preferred and Income Fund Incorporated
Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock
42----
9JPDAX
JPMorgan Preferred and Income Securities Fund
Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock
42----
10PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock
31----

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 5/31/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days). Fama-French Similarity = 1/(1+d), where d is the Euclidean distance between factor betas (market, size, value, profitability, investment, momentum, intangible value) from up to three years of daily returns (min 378 daily observations and regression R² of at least 0.25); 1.00 = identical loadings.