© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

Build a portfolio from scratch — the page previews it live

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

No percentile overlays — plain values and bars

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Preferred Stock

Composite

Peer Group

Expense Ratio
0.56%
#NameTickerAUM
1iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETFPFF$12.3B
2Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities & Income FundCPXAX$7.1B
3Nuveen Preferred Securities and Income FundNPSCX$6B
4First Trust Preferred Securities and Income ETFFPE$6B
5Spectrum Preferred and Capital Securities Income FundPPSIX$5.2B
6Invesco Preferred ETFPGX$3.6B
7Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETFVRP$3B
8Nuveen Preferred & Income Opportunities FundJPC$2.9B
9Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETFPFFA$2.4B
10VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETFPFXF$2.4B
Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
Peer Group
-2.9%-2.9%4.5%-1.47-5.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Peer composites equal-weight the group's share-class representatives' daily returns, including delisted members' alive-era history via the frozen year-end snapshots — though our coverage of closed funds is partial, so composite levels at older dates may run slightly high. Membership is the latest known — style migrators carry their full history. ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
Peer Group
-2.6%-0.5%-0.6%-4.1%-4.8%-2.1%-2.9%1.6%9.6%1.5%8.1%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
19911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
Peer Group
35.5%*15.1%0.7%-16.7%17.9%24.6%21.5%8.9%-7.9%8.3%28.4%9.7%18.7%5.1%-5.9%22.5%-16.6%-30.6%64.2%21.0%9.3%18.9%-1.5%16.3%5.0%8.1%12.4%-6.5%24.1%8.5%6.9%-16.9%7.9%12.3%8.2%-2.6%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
Global Dev
Peer Group
-5.7%*0.31**0.030.000.000.00-0.020.000.68226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Global Dev factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). Fama-French publishes daily factors for developed markets only, so Dev Ex-US is developed markets excluding the US and Global Dev is developed markets including it; emerging markets, a small share of world market capitalization, are not covered by the source data. From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

Factor History

Preferred Stock Composite

No metrics selected — use Add metric to chart factors over time.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Type
80% ETF, 20% Mutual Fund
Asset Class
43% , 28% , 26% , …
Peer Asset Class
Fixed Income
Region
52% , 48%
Peer Group Benchmark
Peer Group
Preferred Stock (54 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
49
3Y Peer Percentile
49
Expense Ratio
0.56%
Median Member AUM
$423M
3Y Flow
+17.5%
Yield
6.03%
Inception
1/25/1991
Holdings (Reported)
942
Turnover
30%
Equity
27%
Derivatives
0%
Net Equity Exposure
46%
ⓘ Methodology

Every figure on this card is an equal-weight aggregate over the composite's share-class-deduped members: the median across the members reporting each field, blank where too few of them do. Three rows depart from that, because a median of them would say nothing: Inception is the group's OLDEST member — where its combined history can start; 3Y Flow is the group's own net flow over its own assets, not the middle member's rate; and Type, Asset Class and Region are compositions by member count. Holdings is the merged look-through book — distinct positions across the members' holdings.

Composite Factors

Not scored — PEER:Preferred Stock’s holdings don’t clear the coverage floor for composite factor scores.

Factor Details

None of the selected metrics are scored for PEER:Preferred Stock — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Asset Class Exposure

Fixed Income92.8%
Cash & Short-Term2.2%
Other1.3%
No Holdings Data3.7%
Short positions of 0.6% of net assets are not shown.ⓘ Methodology

Shares of the fund's long book, from the asset category each position is filed under. The long book is 117% of net assets, so shares are of the long book rather than of the fund - it is levered by 17%. Cash & Short-Term includes 0.5% of net assets the filing does not itemise. The short book is stated under the card and never netted into a slice: a pie cannot draw a negative, and folding a hedge into the class it offsets would make it look like more of that class. 3.7% of this book sits in funds we hold no holdings file for and is drawn as its own slice. Other is everything we could not name as an asset class: holdings the filing itself labels as other, derivative positions at the market value the filing reports rather than at notional, and funds held inside this fund whose own holdings we could not read.

Country Exposure

Level
United States71.6%
United States70.0%
Other1.6%
Developed Ex-US28.0%
Canada9.0%
United Kingdom5.6%
France4.3%
Spain2.4%
Switzerland1.9%
Netherlands1.4%
Other3.4%
Other (1 region)0.3%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

10 of 53 funds (top 10 shown, create for all 53)

#NameTickerWeight %AUM
1iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETFPFF
1.89
$12.3B
2Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities & Income FundCPXAX
1.89
$7.1B
3Nuveen Preferred Securities and Income FundNPSCX
1.89
$6B
4First Trust Preferred Securities and Income ETFFPE
1.89
$6B
5Spectrum Preferred and Capital Securities Income FundPPSIX
1.89
$5.2B
6Invesco Preferred ETFPGX
1.89
$3.6B
7Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETFVRP
1.89
$3B
8Nuveen Preferred & Income Opportunities FundJPC
1.89
$2.9B
9Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETFPFFA
1.89
$2.4B
10VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETFPFXF
1.89
$2.4B
ⓘ Methodology

The funds this composite is made of, each counting once (100 ÷ 10 — the same equal weighting behind its returns and its median exposures), listed largest first by assets. Tick Look-Through to expand them into the stocks they hold. Holdings Concentration beside this card always describes that looked-through book, not this list — it is a statement about exposure, not about the roster. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Concentration

Total Holdings942
Effective Holdings129
Top 10 Weight23.2%
Max Position3.5%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)0%
Top Country (of Net Assets)70%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Every row on this card describes the composite's merged look-through book — the stocks its members hold — not the list of member funds, whatever the Holdings card is showing.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
Preferred Stock Composite
54 funds
Peer Asset Class
2,838 funds
YTD Return
-1.32%-2.33%59
1Y Return
-1.24%-1.51%53
3Y Return (Ann.)
8.98%4.80%92
5Y Return (Ann.)
0.88%0.27%57
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.56%0.52%47
ⓘ Methodology

Preferred Stock Composite is a Sparkline peer composite — its members are the share-class representatives of the funds in the group (one class per fund: the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class). This card ranks it against its asset class, Fixed Income, which is the only pool a composite has: there is no peer group of peer groups, and the region tier is a fund-level grouping. Typical Member rows are medians across those representatives — the value is the group’s median, and the percentile is the median of the members’ own ranks within Fixed Income, so both describe the middle fund rather than the group as a whole. Quartile chips fill the layer the rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). A dash is a window the group is younger than, or one too few Fixed Income funds have a history for to rank against — hover it for which.