© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

QCMU

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Leveraged Funds · 749 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

QCMU

LeveragedSingle Stock

Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF

Expense Ratio
1.07%
AUM
$24M
Inception
6/26/2025
1Y Return
-20.8%36th %ilevs 749 asset-class peers
·

The fund, under normal circumstances, invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in the securities of QCOM and financial instruments, such as swap agreements and options, that, in combination, provide 2X daily leveraged exposure to QCOM, consistent with the fund’s investment objective. The fund is non-diversified.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
QCMU
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF
-20.8%-20.8%111.1%-0.22-68.7%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
QCMU
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF
-21.9%-4.5%-8.1%6.3%-12.5%56.0%-20.8%-11.2%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
2025YTD
QCMU
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF
9.9%*-21.9%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
QCMUUS
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF
-83.3%3.65**-2.37**0.58-3.34**3.21**0.381.020.39226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund ProfileLeveragedSectorSingle Stock

Family
Registrant
Type
ETF
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Leveraged
Region
Peer Group
Leveraged - Equity (703 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
36
Expense Ratio
1.07%
AUM
$24M
Yield
2.63%
Inception
6/26/2025
Holdings (Reported)
9
Turnover
0%
Equity
24%
Derivatives
-62%
Net Equity Exposure
24%
Strategy Summary

The fund, under normal circumstances, invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in the securities of QCOM and financial instruments, such as swap agreements and options, that, in combination, provide 2X daily leveraged exposure to QCOM, consistent with the fund’s investment objective. The fund is non-diversified.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from market data (10/6/2026). Turnover from market data (10/6/2026). Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 7/31/2026. Summary may be from an older prospectus.

Composite Factors

Not scored — QCMU’s holdings don’t clear the coverage floor for composite factor scores.

Factor DetailsRef: Leveraged Funds

Based on equity exposure only (24% of total assets).

None of the selected metrics are scored for QCMU — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Leveraged Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Sector Exposure

Level

Based on equity exposure only (24% of total assets).

100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the fund's classified holdings — every position we can identify, with cash and unidentified positions excluded — not portfolio weights. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Thematic Exposure

Based on equity exposure only (24% of total assets).

Old vs New Economy

Old Economy0.0%
New Economy100.0%

China Exposure

China/HK Domiciled0.0%
Revenue & Operations100.0%
Operations Only0.0%
Revenue Only0.0%
No Material Exposure0.0%

Company Size

Mega (>$500B)0.0%
Large ($70–500B)100.0%
Mid ($10–70B)0.0%
Small ($1–10B)0.0%
Micro (<$1B)0.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the fund's classified equity book, renormalized so each split sums to 100% (the equity book is 24% of net assets) — they are not portfolio weights. China exposure: domiciled = incorporated in China or Hong Kong, falling back to the filing's country for holdings outside the stock model. Among the rest, revenue = ≥15% of revenue derived from China; operations = ≥3% of LinkedIn-tracked workforce in China, or ≥2 identified Chinese suppliers making up ≥12% of those identified. China revenue is estimated where segment reporting is absent. Company size bands by holding market cap: Mega >$500B, Large $70–500B, Mid $10–70B, Small $1–10B, Micro <$1B. Old vs New Economy partitions Sparkline's 48 industries: New = technology, internet platforms and entertainment, e-commerce, payments, pharma/biotech/medtech, and renewable energy; Old = everything else. Shares are of classified holdings and sum to 100%. China shares are of total equity weight. Size shares are of scored holdings weight. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

9 positions

#NameTickerWeight %SectorIndustryCountry
1Dreyfus-
64.97
--USA
2Goldman Sachs Liq ES FD A-
48.75
--USA
3QualcommQCOM
23.52
TechnologySemiconductorsUSA
4Dreyfus-
14.41
--USA
5Goldman Financial-
10.44
--USA
6--
-0.82
--USA
7--
-0.83
--USA
8--
-25.82
--USA
9--
-34.74
--USA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Leveraged Funds

Total Holdings9
Effective Holdings3.5
Top 10 Weight162.1%
Max Position65.0%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)139%
Top Country (of Net Assets)100%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Leveraged Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 7/31/2026.

Benchmark DifferentiationRef: Leveraged Funds

vs SPYBroad Benchmark
Active Share99.7%
ⓘ Methodology

One sub-card per benchmark: the market primary, then the style secondary — the gap between them is the style sleeve itself. Both anchors are Sparkline-inferred (market from asset class and region, style from the holdings size-and-style map), not the fund's official prospectus benchmark. Solid blue dot marks the fund; the shaded band spans the reference set's 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median (band follows the Peer Universe selector). Active Share compares the fund's book with the benchmark's, share for share; Tracking Error is the annualized daily deviation over the trailing two years (ruler runs to just past the universe's 95th percentile, or past the fund's own figure where that is larger); Benchmark Correlation is the plain daily correlation over the trailing year. Hover the labels for full definitions.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
QCMU
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF
Peer Group
703 funds
Peer Asset Class
749 funds
YTD Return
-21.87%-10.30%42-10.88%42
1Y Return
-20.78%7.18%36-0.94%36
3Y Return (Ann.)
---
5Y Return (Ann.)
---
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
1.07%0.99%410.99%40
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (768 share classes across 703 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity98
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
FundPeer Group
1TXNU
Direxion Daily TXN Bull 2X ETF
Leveraged - Equity
Leveraged - Equity
98--
2MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
Leveraged - Equity
Leveraged - Equity
98--
3XOMX
Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares
Leveraged - Equity
Leveraged - Equity
98--
4SOFA
Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF
Leveraged - Equity
Leveraged - Equity
97--
5SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares
Inverse - Equity
Inverse - Equity
97--
6NFXL
Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares
Leveraged - Equity
Leveraged - Equity
97--
7METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X Shares
Leveraged - Equity
Leveraged - Equity
97--
8ELIL
Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X Shares
Leveraged - Equity
Leveraged - Equity
97--
9BRKU
Direxion Daily BRKB Bull 2X Shares
Leveraged - Equity
Leveraged - Equity
97--
10GOIB
Direxion GOOGL Defined Income Boost ETF
Cash & Ultra-Short
Cash & Ultra-Short
96--

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap.