© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

HARD

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Commodities Funds · 113 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

HARD

Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF

Expense Ratio
0.78%
AUM
$59M
Inception
3/29/2023
1Y Return
+13.2%35th %ilevs 113 asset-class peers
·

The fund invests in a portfolio of commodity futures contracts and commodity indices, aiming to capture economic benefits from rising price trends. Under normal market conditions, it generally maintains a net long bias, taking long positions on contracts with positive trends and short positions on those with negative trends, based on expected returns from the Futures Adviser's models. The fund may also hold short-term U.S. Treasury securities or high credit quality fixed-income securities for direct investment or as collateral for futures contracts, while investing up to 25% of its assets in a wholly-owned subsidiary for additional commodity market exposure.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
HARD
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF
13.2%13.2%28.9%0.33-21.0%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
HARD
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF
17.1%-0.3%0.3%1.3%13.2%-3.8%13.2%21.2%15.2%12.5%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
202320242025YTD
HARD
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF
-5.0%*20.5%13.2%17.1%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
HARDUS
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF
19.6%-0.49-0.61*0.43*-0.55**-0.18-0.19-0.300.12226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Fund Documents(opens the fund company’s site in a new tab)
Family
Registrant
Type
ETF
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Commodities
Region
Peer Group Benchmark
Prospectus Benchmark
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index
Peer Group
Commodities - Broad (52 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
7
3Y Peer Percentile
26
Expense Ratio
0.78%
AUM
$59M
3Y Flow
+1374.2%
Yield
3.47%
Inception
3/29/2023
Holdings (Reported)
77
Turnover
0%
Equity
0%
Derivatives
-5%
Net Equity Exposure
0%
Strategy Summary

The fund invests in a portfolio of commodity futures contracts and commodity indices, aiming to capture economic benefits from rising price trends. Under normal market conditions, it generally maintains a net long bias, taking long positions on contracts with positive trends and short positions on those with negative trends, based on expected returns from the Futures Adviser's models. The fund may also hold short-term U.S. Treasury securities or high credit quality fixed-income securities for direct investment or as collateral for futures contracts, while investing up to 25% of its assets in a wholly-owned subsidiary for additional commodity market exposure.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the fund's prospectus fee table. Turnover from the SEC annual report (9/8/2026). Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 6/30/2026. Strategy summary from the fund's prospectus.

Factor DetailsRef: Commodities Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for HARD — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Commodities Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Country Exposure

Level

Based on holdings that carry a country (24% of total assets).

98.5%
98.5%
1.5%
1.0%
Other0.5%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

77 positions (top 10 shown, create for full holdings) · 73.1% in funds

#NameTickerWeight %Country
1Simplify Exchange Traded FundsSBIL
73.09
USA
2United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt-
6.10
USA
3United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt-
5.49
USA
4United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt-
5.46
USA
5United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt-
3.05
USA
6Dreyfus TRSY Oblig Cash M-
2.65
USA
7United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt-
2.43
USA
8Ice Futures U.S.-
0.59
USA
9Chicago Mercantile Exchange-
0.32
USA
10Ice Futures U.S.-
0.24
USA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. "In funds" adds up the rows tagged Fund — holdings that are themselves funds this app covers, which is what look-through can expand; a held vehicle that files no holdings of its own (a commodity or currency trust, a money-market fund) is not counted and stays a single line. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Commodities Funds

Total Holdings77
Effective Holdings1.8
Top 10 Weight99.4%
Max Position73.1%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)100%
Top Country (of Net Assets)100%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Commodities Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
HARD
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF
Peer Group
52 funds
Peer Asset Class
113 funds
YTD Return
17.11%32.67%1219.73%48
1Y Return
13.24%38.87%724.77%35
3Y Return (Ann.)
15.17%16.83%2617.14%31
5Y Return (Ann.)
---
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.78%0.70%420.71%43
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (115 share classes across 52 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity90
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Return Corr
FundPeer Group
1CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Alts - Managed Futures/CTA
Alts - Managed Futures/CTA
90---
2DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
Commodities - Broad
Commodities - Broad
24---
3FOXY
Simplify Currency Strategy ETF
Cash & Ultra-Short
Cash & Ultra-Short
24---
4BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
Commodities - Broad
Commodities - Broad
19---
5GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
Commodities - Broad
Commodities - Broad
19---
6FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
Commodities - Broad
Commodities - Broad
19---
7SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
Commodities - Broad
Commodities - Broad
19---
8YGLD
Simplify Gold Strategy ETF
Commodities - Metals
Commodities - Metals
19---
9QIS
Simplify Multi-QIS Alternative ETF
Leveraged - Equity
Leveraged - Equity
19---
10CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
Commodities - Broad
Commodities - Broad
18---

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days).