© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

SDCI

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Commodities Funds · 113 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

SDCI

USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund

Expense Ratio
0.60%
AUM
$796M
Inception
5/4/2018
1Y Return
+41.5%76th %ilevs 113 asset-class peers
·

The index reflects the performance of a fully margined and collateralized portfolio of commodities futures contracts. Under normal market conditions, the fund will invest 80% of its assets in futures contracts and other commodity-related derivative instruments. In determining the value of the fund’s assets for this purpose, it will value each derivative instrument using the instrument’s notional amount. The fund is non-diversified.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
41.5%41.5%17.9%2.10-11.0%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
42.0%-0.6%0.3%1.9%15.6%14.0%41.5%31.2%24.9%21.6%12.9%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
20182019202020212022202320242025YTD
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
-10.2%*-2.4%-10.6%37.3%32.5%-0.9%17.9%17.6%42.0%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
SDCIUS
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
38.0%*-0.13-0.49**0.36**-0.33*-0.10-0.14-0.32*0.14226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Fund Documents(opens the fund company’s site in a new tab)
Family
Registrant
Type
ETF
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Commodities
Region
Peer Group Benchmark
Prospectus Benchmark
S And P500 Index200080 Member Index
Peer Group
Commodities - Broad (52 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
63
3Y Peer Percentile
95
Expense Ratio
0.60%
5Y Tax Drag
7.04%/yr
AUM
$796M
3Y Flow
+5269.3%
Yield
2.59%
Inception
5/4/2018
Holdings (Reported)
43
Turnover
0%
Equity
0%
Derivatives
-2%
Net Equity Exposure
0%
Strategy Summary

The index reflects the performance of a fully margined and collateralized portfolio of commodities futures contracts. Under normal market conditions, the fund will invest 80% of its assets in futures contracts and other commodity-related derivative instruments. In determining the value of the fund’s assets for this purpose, it will value each derivative instrument using the instrument’s notional amount. The fund is non-diversified.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the fund's prospectus fee table; tax drag from its after-tax return table. Turnover from the SEC annual report (9/4/2026). Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 6/30/2026. Strategy summary from the fund's prospectus. Summary may be from an older prospectus.

Factor DetailsRef: Commodities Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for SDCI — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Commodities Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Country Exposure

Level
98.4%
98.4%
1.6%
1.6%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

43 positions (top 10 shown, create for full holdings)

#NameWeight %Country
1United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt
7.98
USA
2United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt
6.99
USA
3United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt
5.69
USA
4United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt
3.80
USA
5United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt
3.79
USA
6United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt
3.77
USA
7United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt
2.83
USA
8United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt
2.28
USA
9United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt
2.08
USA
10United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt
1.90
USA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Commodities Funds

Total Holdings43
Effective Holdings13.5
Top 10 Weight41.1%
Max Position8.0%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)55%
Top Country (of Net Assets)55%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Commodities Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
Peer Group
52 funds
Peer Asset Class
113 funds
YTD Return
41.99%32.67%7619.73%82
1Y Return
41.47%38.87%6324.77%76
3Y Return (Ann.)
24.91%16.83%9517.14%75
5Y Return (Ann.)
21.64%11.60%9411.86%95
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.60%0.70%690.71%62
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (115 share classes across 52 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity71
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Return Corr
FundPeer Group
1BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
Commodities - Broad
Commodities - Broad
71---
2BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
Commodities - Broad
Commodities - Broad
70---
3PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
Commodities - Broad
Commodities - Broad
62---
4FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
Commodities - Broad
Commodities - Broad
53---
5VBIL
VANGUARD 0-3 MONTH TREASURY BILL ETF
Cash & Ultra-Short
Cash & Ultra-Short
53---
6CSHI
NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
Cash & Ultra-Short
Cash & Ultra-Short
45---
7EDGH
3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF
Fixed Income - Core
Fixed Income - Core
45---
8RAAX
VanEck Real Assets ETF
Allocation - Moderate
Allocation - Moderate
41---
9CMCAX
CM Commodity Index Fund
Commodities - Broad
Commodities - Broad
38---
10ASMF
Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF
Alts - Managed Futures/CTA
Alts - Managed Futures/CTA
38---

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days).