© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

CBOJ

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Digital Assets Funds · 168 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

CBOJ

Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January

Expense Ratio
0.69%
AUM
$16M
Inception
1/23/2025
1Y Return
-4.6%89th %ilevs 168 asset-class peers
·

The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to provide investment results, that before taking total fund operating fees and expenses into account, track the positive price return of spot bitcoin up to the stated cap over a specified period of time of approximately one year, while seeking to provide protection against decreases in the price of spot bitcoin of more than 10% over the same Outcome Period. It is non-diversified.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
CBOJ
Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January
-4.6%-4.6%4.5%-1.85-8.2%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
CBOJ
Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January
1.5%-0.4%0.0%0.8%3.3%2.6%-4.6%0.4%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
2025YTD
CBOJ
Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January
-0.8%*1.5%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
CBOJUS
Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January
-10.8%*0.13**0.00-0.02-0.07**0.04-0.06**-0.07**0.26226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Family
Registrant
Type
ETF
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Digital Assets
Region
Peer Group
Digital Assets - Futures (76 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
93
Expense Ratio
0.69%
AUM
$16M
Yield
3.10%
Inception
1/23/2025
Holdings (Reported)
5
Turnover
0%
Equity
100%
Derivatives
100%
Net Equity Exposure
0%
Option Notional
-210%
Strategy Summary

The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to provide investment results, that before taking total fund operating fees and expenses into account, track the positive price return of spot bitcoin up to the stated cap over a specified period of time of approximately one year, while seeking to provide protection against decreases in the price of spot bitcoin of more than 10% over the same Outcome Period. It is non-diversified.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from market data (10/6/2026). Turnover from market data (10/6/2026). Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 7/31/2026. Summary may be from an older prospectus.

Factor DetailsRef: Digital Assets Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for CBOJ — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Digital Assets Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Country Exposure

Level

Based on holdings that carry a country (74% of total assets).

100.0%
100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

5 positions · 150% in funds

#NameTickerWeight %Country
1State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF TrustSPY
149.52
USA
2Jared, Mulcay & Co.-
2.17
USA
3State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF TrustSPY
0.50
USA
4Jared, Mulcay & Co.-
-1.21
USA
5State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF TrustSPY
-51.51
USA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. "In funds" adds up the rows tagged Fund — holdings that are themselves funds this app covers, which is what look-through can expand; a held vehicle that files no holdings of its own (a commodity or currency trust, a money-market fund) is not counted and stays a single line. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Digital Assets Funds

Total Holdings5
Effective Holdings1
Top 10 Weight152.2%
Max Position149.5%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)152%
Top Country (of Net Assets)100%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Digital Assets Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 7/31/2026.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
CBOJ
Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January
Peer Group
76 funds
Peer Asset Class
168 funds
YTD Return
1.54%-7.26%79-4.79%66
1Y Return
-4.60%-29.74%93-31.57%89
3Y Return (Ann.)
---
5Y Return (Ann.)
---
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.69%0.89%740.69%48
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (80 share classes across 76 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity89
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Return Corr
FundPeer Group
1CBXJ
Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January
Digital Assets - Futures
Digital Assets - Futures
89---
2CBTJ
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January
Digital Assets - Futures
Digital Assets - Futures
86---
3HF
Dga Core Plus Absolute Return ETF
Alts - Global Macro
Alts - Global Macro
61---
4ETFRX
NORTH SQUARE TACTICAL DEFENSIVE FUND
Allocation - Tactical/Dynamic
Allocation - Tactical/Dynamic
58---
5NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
Allocation - Tactical/Dynamic
Allocation - Tactical/Dynamic
54---
6XJUN
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June
Options - Buffer/Defined Outcome
Options - Buffer/Defined Outcome
54---
7RAA
SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF
Allocation - Moderate
Allocation - Moderate
52---
8FTGOX
WESTWOOD BROADMARK TACTICAL GROWTH FUND
Allocation - Tactical/Dynamic
Allocation - Tactical/Dynamic
52---
9XTAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - April
US Large Core
US Large Core
52---
10TRND
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
Allocation - Aggressive
Allocation - Aggressive
50---

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days).