Peer Asset Class
| # | Name | Ticker | AUM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | IBIT | $67.1B |
| 2 | Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | FBTC | $15.5B |
| 3 | Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | GBTC | $10.6B |
| 4 | iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | ETHA | $9.8B |
| 5 | Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | BTC | $5.3B |
| 6 | Bitwise Bitcoin ETF | BITB | $3.2B |
| 7 | ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | ARKB | $2.9B |
| 8 | Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF | ETH | $2.5B |
| 9 | Grayscale Ethereum Staking ETF | ETHE | $2B |
| 10 | ProShares Bitcoin ETF | BITO | $1.7B |
| Name | Cumulative Return | Ann. Return | Ann. Vol | Sharpe | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peer Asset Class | -29.0% | -29.0% | 42.6% | -0.77 | -45.5% |
Peer composites equal-weight the group's share-class representatives' daily returns, including delisted members' alive-era history via the frozen year-end snapshots — though our coverage of closed funds is partial, so composite levels at older dates may run slightly high. Membership is the latest known — style migrators carry their full history. ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/8/2025 to 10/8/2026.
Name | YTD | 1D | 5D | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 2Y | 3Y | 5Y | MAX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peer Asset Class | -3.6% | -3.1% | -5.5% | 1.1% | 24.4% | 14.3% | -29.0% | 13.4% | 42.1% | 4.8% | 60.4% |
ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/8/2026.
Name | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | YTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peer Asset Class | 106.3%* | 101.4% | 1557.2% | -64.1% | 23.7% | 311.7% | 17.5% | -71.3% | 217.2% | 75.4% | -2.4% | -3.6% |
* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/8/2026.
Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.
Name | Ann. α | β MKT | β SMB | β HML | β RMW | β CMA | β UMD | β iHML | R² | Obs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global Dev Peer Asset Class | -42.9% | 1.33** | -0.23 | 0.60 | -1.68** | -1.77** | -0.56* | -0.54* | 0.43 | 225 |
ETF performance based on market prices. Global Dev factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). Fama-French publishes daily factors for developed markets only, so Dev Ex-US is developed markets excluding the US and Global Dev is developed markets including it; emerging markets, a small share of world market capitalization, are not covered by the source data. From 10/8/2025 to 8/31/2026.
Digital Assets Composite
No metrics selected — use Add metric to chart factors over time.
Every figure on this card is an equal-weight aggregate over the composite's share-class-deduped members: the median across the members reporting each field, blank where too few of them do. Three rows depart from that, because a median of them would say nothing: Inception is the group's OLDEST member — where its combined history can start; 3Y Flow is the group's own net flow over its own assets, not the middle member's rate; and Type, Asset Class and Region are compositions by member count. Holdings is the merged look-through book — distinct positions across the members' holdings.
Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Ranked within the clean equity fund universe, one entry per fund series (lowest: 0, highest: 100; the middle of the range is denser than the ends). Blue dots mark the fund's universe-normalized score; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.
Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.
Shares of the fund's long book, from the asset category each position is filed under. The short book is stated under the card and never netted into a slice: a pie cannot draw a negative, and folding a hedge into the class it offsets would make it look like more of that class. 6.0% of this book sits in funds we hold no holdings file for and is drawn as its own slice. Other is everything we could not name as an asset class: holdings the filing itself labels as other, derivative positions at the market value the filing reports rather than at notional, and funds held inside this fund whose own holdings we could not read.
Based on holdings that carry a country (38% of total assets).
Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.
10 of 160 funds (top 10 shown, create for all 160)
| # | Name | Ticker | Weight % | AUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | IBIT | 0.62 | $67.1B |
| 2 | Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | FBTC | 0.62 | $15.5B |
| 3 | Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | GBTC | 0.62 | $10.6B |
| 4 | iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | ETHA | 0.62 | $9.8B |
| 5 | Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | BTC | 0.62 | $5.3B |
| 6 | Bitwise Bitcoin ETF | BITB | 0.62 | $3.2B |
| 7 | ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | ARKB | 0.62 | $2.9B |
| 8 | Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF | ETH | 0.62 | $2.5B |
| 9 | Grayscale Ethereum Staking ETF | ETHE | 0.62 | $2B |
| 10 | ProShares Bitcoin ETF | BITO | 0.62 | $1.7B |
The funds this composite is made of, each counting once (100 ÷ 10 — the same equal weighting behind its returns and its median exposures), listed largest first by assets. Tick Look-Through to expand them into the stocks they hold. Holdings Concentration beside this card always describes that looked-through book, not this list — it is a statement about exposure, not about the roster. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.
Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Every row on this card describes the composite's merged look-through book — the stocks its members hold — not the list of member funds, whatever the Holdings card is showing.
Digital Assets is an asset class — the widest pool this card ranks in — so there is no larger group to rank it against. Its members’ standings live on their own pages, and the narrower groups inside it are each ranked here against Digital Assets.
MethodologyDigital Assets Composite is a Sparkline peer composite — its members are the share-class representatives of the funds in the group (one class per fund: the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class).