© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

ATRAX

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Alternatives Funds · 251 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

ATRAX

Catalyst Systematic Alpha Fund

Expense Ratio
2.10%
AUM
$115M
Inception
8/1/2014
1Y Return
+7.9%42nd %ilevs 251 asset-class peers
·

The fund invests primarily in securities that provide exposure to the BNP Paribas Catalyst Systematic Alpha Index III, including structured notes, swap contracts, futures contracts, and fixed income securities, mainly high quality, short-term U.S. corporate bonds. It aims for a majority of its fixed income portfolio to consist of investment grade corporate bonds rated BBB- or higher, with an average effective maturity of less than four years and an average duration of less than three and a half. The fund may also invest up to 25% of total assets in a wholly-owned subsidiary that tracks the Benchmark.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
ATRAX
Catalyst Systematic Alpha Fund
7.9%7.9%22.0%0.19-22.6%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
ATRAX
Catalyst Systematic Alpha Fund
8.2%-0.3%1.3%5.2%9.0%31.3%7.9%4.1%4.4%5.9%5.4%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
ATRAX
Catalyst Systematic Alpha Fund
-1.3%*1.6%-2.5%1.8%-19.8%30.2%15.0%25.7%-4.7%25.0%-5.0%2.6%8.2%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
ATRAXUS
Catalyst Systematic Alpha Fund
-18.4%1.04**0.110.040.080.090.28**-0.070.56226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Fund Documents(opens the fund company’s site in a new tab)
Family
Registrant
Type
Mutual Fund
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Alternatives
Region
Peer Group Benchmark
Prospectus Benchmark
S&P 500 ® Index
Peer Group
Alts - Alternative Risk Premia (10 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
20
3Y Peer Percentile
0
Expense Ratio
2.10%
5Y Tax Drag
3.41%/yr
AUM
$115M
3Y Flow
+250.6%
Yield
3.04%
Inception
8/1/2014
Holdings (Reported)
30
Turnover
50%
Equity
0%
Derivatives
6%
Net Equity Exposure
0%
Strategy Summary

The fund invests primarily in securities that provide exposure to the BNP Paribas Catalyst Systematic Alpha Index III, including structured notes, swap contracts, futures contracts, and fixed income securities, mainly high quality, short-term U.S. corporate bonds. It aims for a majority of its fixed income portfolio to consist of investment grade corporate bonds rated BBB- or higher, with an average effective maturity of less than four years and an average duration of less than three and a half. The fund may also invest up to 25% of total assets in a wholly-owned subsidiary that tracks the Benchmark.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the fund's prospectus fee table; tax drag from its after-tax return table. Turnover from the SEC annual report (9/8/2026). Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 6/30/2026. Strategy summary from the fund's prospectus.

Factor DetailsRef: Alternatives Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for ATRAX — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Alternatives Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Asset Class Exposure

Alternatives100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Taken from what this fund IS rather than from what it files. Its exposure is carried in swaps or futures that mark at close to nothing, so the book it reports is the collateral behind them and a pie of that book would describe a margin account. Gearing is not expressed here - a 3x fund reads 100% of its asset class, not 300%. An alternative strategy is counted by what the fund is, not by what it holds: a long/short or managed futures book is ordinary stocks and Treasury collateral, and neither describes the exposure the fund gives. A fund that is short is counted here too, rather than in the asset class it is short of.

Country Exposure

Level

Based on holdings that carry a country (66% of total assets).

100.0%
100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

30 positions (top 10 shown, create for full holdings)

#NameTickerWeight %SectorIndustryCountry
1Catalyst International UCITS ICAV-
24.18
--IRL
2United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt-
11.13
--USA
3United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt-
8.04
--USA
4United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt-
7.92
--USA
5First American Funds-
7.81
--USA
6United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt-
4.93
--USA
7United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt-
4.46
--USA
8Ford MotorF
2.53
Consumer DiscAutomobilesUSA
9United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt-
2.52
--USA
10NetflixNFLX
2.18
CommunicationEntertainmentUSA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Alternatives Funds

Total Holdings30
Effective Holdings9.2
Top 10 Weight75.7%
Max Position24.2%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)78%
Top Country (of Net Assets)71%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Alternatives Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
ATRAX
Catalyst Systematic Alpha Fund
Peer Group
10 funds
Peer Asset Class
251 funds
YTD Return
8.24%9.84%307.46%54
1Y Return
7.87%15.19%209.49%42
3Y Return (Ann.)
4.44%11.28%09.39%11
5Y Return (Ann.)
5.88%8.32%125.24%57
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
2.10%2.04%401.42%23
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (17 share classes across 10 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity71
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Return Corr
Top FF Match
FundPeer Group
1RHSAX
Rational Strategic Allocation Fund
Alts - Capital Efficient (Equity+)
Alts - Capital Efficient (Equity+)
71----
2XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
Cash & Ultra-Short
Cash & Ultra-Short
39----
3BLUIX
BLUEPRINT ADAPTIVE GROWTH ALLOCATION FUND
Allocation - Aggressive
Allocation - Aggressive
18----
4ONEZ
TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF
Options - Buffer/Defined Outcome
Options - Buffer/Defined Outcome
18----
5ABYIX
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund
Fixed Income - Core
Fixed Income - Core
18----
6AQMIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Alts - Managed Futures/CTA
Alts - Managed Futures/CTA
17----
7ETFOX
NORTH SQUARE TACTICAL GROWTH FUND
Allocation - Tactical/Dynamic
Allocation - Tactical/Dynamic
17----
8QMHIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund
Alts - Managed Futures/CTA
Alts - Managed Futures/CTA
17----
9CSAIX
Mast Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Alts - Managed Futures/CTA
Alts - Managed Futures/CTA
14----
10CASAX
Catalyst/Aspect Enhanced Multi-Asset Fund
Fixed Income - Core
Fixed Income - Core
14----

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days). Fama-French Similarity = 1/(1+d), where d is the Euclidean distance between factor betas (market, size, value, profitability, investment, momentum, intangible value) from up to three years of daily returns (min 378 daily observations and regression R² of at least 0.25); 1.00 = identical loadings.