© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

ASTU

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Leveraged Funds · 749 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

ASTU

LeveragedSingle Stock

T-REX 2X Long ASTS Daily Target ETF

AUM
$1M
Time Series

Performance

No return history for ASTU (T-REX 2X Long ASTS Daily Target ETF). The returns, correlation and regression cards are hidden.
SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund ProfileLeveragedSectorSingle Stock

Type
ETF
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Leveraged
Region
Peer Group
Leveraged - Equity (703 peers)
AUM
$1M
Holdings (Reported)
2
Equity
88%
Derivatives
88%
Net Equity Exposure
198%
ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the prospectus fee table, else the SEC annual shareholder report, else market data. AUM as of 7/31/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 7/31/2026.

Composite Factors

Not scored — ASTU’s holdings don’t clear the coverage floor for composite factor scores.

Factor DetailsRef: Leveraged Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for ASTU — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Leveraged Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. AUM as of 7/31/2026.

Country Exposure

Level
100.0%
100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Sector Exposure

Level
100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the fund's classified holdings — every position we can identify, with cash and unidentified positions excluded — not portfolio weights. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Thematic Exposure

Old vs New Economy

Old Economy0.0%
New Economy100.0%

Company Size

Mega (>$500B)0.0%
Large ($70–500B)0.0%
Mid ($10–70B)100.0%
Small ($1–10B)0.0%
Micro (<$1B)0.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the fund's classified equity book, renormalized so each split sums to 100% (the equity book is 88% of net assets) — they are not portfolio weights. Company size bands by holding market cap: Mega >$500B, Large $70–500B, Mid $10–70B, Small $1–10B, Micro <$1B. Old vs New Economy partitions Sparkline's 48 industries: New = technology, internet platforms and entertainment, e-commerce, payments, pharma/biotech/medtech, and renewable energy; Old = everything else. Shares are of classified holdings and sum to 100%. Size shares are of scored holdings weight. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

2 positions

#NameTickerWeight %SectorIndustryCountry
1AST SpaceMobileASTS
18.48
TechnologyTechnology HardwareUSA
2First American Government Obli-
2.46
--USA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Leveraged Funds

Total Holdings2
Effective Holdings1.3
Top 10 Weight20.9%
Max Position18.5%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)18%
Top Country (of Net Assets)21%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Leveraged Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 7/31/2026.

Benchmark DifferentiationRef: Leveraged Funds

vs SPYBroad Benchmark
Active Share100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

One sub-card per benchmark: the market primary, then the style secondary — the gap between them is the style sleeve itself. Both anchors are Sparkline-inferred (market from asset class and region, style from the holdings size-and-style map), not the fund's official prospectus benchmark. Solid blue dot marks the fund; the shaded band spans the reference set's 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median (band follows the Peer Universe selector). Active Share compares the fund's book with the benchmark's, share for share; Tracking Error is the annualized daily deviation over the trailing two years (ruler runs to just past the universe's 95th percentile, or past the fund's own figure where that is larger); Benchmark Correlation is the plain daily correlation over the trailing year. Hover the labels for full definitions.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (768 share classes across 703 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity46
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
FundPeer Group
1ASTX
Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF
Leveraged - Equity
Leveraged - Equity
46--
2HFCSX
Hennessy Focus Fund
US Mid Core
US Mid Core
41--
3ASTG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF
Leveraged - Equity
Leveraged - Equity
40--
4ASTN
Defiance Daily Target 2x Short Asts ETF
Inverse - Equity
Inverse - Equity
36--
5MARS
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF
Sector - Aerospace & Defense
Sector - Aerospace & Defense
11--
6ORBX
Global X Space Tech ETF
Sector - Aerospace & Defense
Sector - Aerospace & Defense
11--
7FSTCX
Select Telecommunications Portfolio
Sector - Communications
Sector - Communications
9--
8WARP
VanEck Space ETF
Sector - Aerospace & Defense
Sector - Aerospace & Defense
8--
9MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
US Mid Growth
US Mid Growth
8--
10NASA
Tema Space Innovators ETF
Sector - Aerospace & Defense
Sector - Aerospace & Defense
8--

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap.