© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

Build a portfolio from scratch — the page previews it live

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

No percentile overlays — plain values and bars

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Sector - Homebuilding

Composite

Peer Group

Expense Ratio
0.47%
#NameTickerAUM
1iShares U.S. Home Construction ETFITB$2.4B
2State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETFXHB$1.4B
3Select Construction and Housing PortfolioFSHOX$557M
4Invesco Building & Construction ETFPKB$278M
Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
Peer Group
-9.0%-9.0%24.5%-0.52-19.6%
ⓘ Methodology

Peer composites equal-weight the group's share-class representatives' daily returns, including delisted members' alive-era history via the frozen year-end snapshots — though our coverage of closed funds is partial, so composite levels at older dates may run slightly high. Membership is the latest known — style migrators carry their full history. ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
Peer Group
-5.6%-2.7%-0.5%-7.0%-12.7%-3.6%-9.0%-5.4%12.1%8.5%10.4%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
1986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
Peer Group
7.6%*-12.4%29.2%16.6%-9.7%41.4%18.7%33.6%-15.9%28.8%13.2%29.6%22.8%-12.4%8.8%20.0%-8.5%44.1%28.5%8.4%-2.7%-31.6%-34.1%19.2%16.6%-3.6%54.9%23.5%5.2%5.9%6.0%35.0%-26.0%43.0%26.9%47.3%-25.1%53.3%11.9%5.3%-5.6%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
US
Peer Group
-22.1%1.47**0.78**0.130.36**0.73**-0.03-0.40**0.64226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

Factor History

Sector - Homebuilding Composite

No metrics selected — use Add metric to chart factors over time.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Type
75% ETF, 25% Mutual Fund
Asset Class
Equity
Region
Equity Size & Style
Peer Group
Sector - Homebuilding (4 peers)
Expense Ratio
0.47%
5Y Tax Drag
0.24%/yr
Median Member AUM
$994M
3Y Flow
+150.0%
Yield
1.11%
Inception
9/29/1986
Holdings (Reported)
103
Turnover
24%
Equity
96%
Derivatives
0%
Net Equity Exposure
100%
ⓘ Methodology

Every figure on this card is an equal-weight aggregate over the composite's share-class-deduped members: the median across the members reporting each field, blank where too few of them do. Three rows depart from that, because a median of them would say nothing: Inception is the group's OLDEST member — where its combined history can start; 3Y Flow is the group's own net flow over its own assets, not the middle member's rate; and Type, Asset Class and Region are compositions by member count. Holdings is the merged look-through book — distinct positions across the members' holdings.

Equity Size & Style Map

LargeMidSmall
3%
16%
5%
14%
16%
11%
12%
18%
6%
Large
ValueCoreGrowth
Size
Large
24%
Mid
41%
Small
36%
Style
Value
28%
Core
50%
Growth
22%
ⓘ Methodology

Equity size and style definitions: Large vs. Small based on market cap, where Large > $70B, Mid $10-70B, and Small < $10B. Value vs. Growth based on percentile ranking on Traditional Value score within the fund's region and size cohort (equal thirds among its true equity-fund peers). Cell shading and percentages: share of classified holdings weight per box, from stock-level classification (size on the same $70B/$10B lines; value by Traditional Value terciles across scored stocks). The dot is the average holding ranked against other funds, so dot and weights can differ at the margin. The Size and Style bars are the grid's row and column totals. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Composite Factors

Intangible Value38.6
Traditional Value60.5
Small-Cap70.4
Quality54.6
Momentum5.5
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Ranked within the clean equity fund universe, one entry per fund series (lowest: 0, highest: 100; the middle of the range is denser than the ends). Blue dots mark the fund's universe-normalized score; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Factor Details

Valuation
Book-to-Price (NTM)36.7
Sales-to-Price (NTM)66.1
Earnings-to-Price (NTM)5.2
Innovation/IP
R&D / Mkt Cap0.71
Patents / Mkt Cap0.19
Brand
Sales & Marketing / Mkt Cap1.8
Trademarks / Mkt Cap0.14
Human Capital
PhD Employees / Mkt Cap1.7
Top University Alumni / Mkt Cap8.7
Politics
Lobbying Spend / Mkt Cap6.5
AI
AI Employees / Mkt Cap0.17
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Asset Class Exposure

Equity94.2%
Cash & Short-Term5.8%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares of the fund's long book, from the asset category each position is filed under.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

4 funds

#NameTickerWeight %AUM
1iShares U.S. Home Construction ETFITB
25.00
$2.4B
2State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETFXHB
25.00
$1.4B
3Select Construction and Housing PortfolioFSHOX
25.00
$557M
4Invesco Building & Construction ETFPKB
25.00
$278M
ⓘ Methodology

The funds this composite is made of, each counting once (100 ÷ 4 — the same equal weighting behind its returns and its median exposures), listed largest first by assets. Tick Look-Through to expand them into the stocks they hold. Holdings Concentration beside this card always describes that looked-through book, not this list — it is a statement about exposure, not about the roster. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Concentration

Total Holdings103
Effective Holdings46.3
Top 10 Weight37.4%
Max Position6.7%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)0%
Top Country (of Net Assets)0%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Every row on this card describes the composite's merged look-through book — the stocks its members hold — not the list of member funds, whatever the Holdings card is showing.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
Sector - Homebuilding Composite
4 funds
Peer Asset Class
5,640 funds
YTD Return
-5.66%11.63%5
1Y Return
-8.66%14.46%4
3Y Return (Ann.)
10.13%18.47%11
5Y Return (Ann.)
6.50%8.64%33
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.47%0.74%72
ⓘ Methodology

Sector - Homebuilding Composite is a Sparkline peer composite — its members are the share-class representatives of the funds in the group (one class per fund: the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class). This card ranks it against its asset class, Equity, which is the only pool a composite has: there is no peer group of peer groups, and the region tier is a fund-level grouping. Typical Member rows are medians across those representatives — the value is the group’s median, and the percentile is the median of the members’ own ranks within Equity, so both describe the middle fund rather than the group as a whole. Quartile chips fill the layer the rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). A dash is a window the group is younger than, or one too few Equity funds have a history for to rank against — hover it for which.