© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

Build a portfolio from scratch — the page previews it live

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

No percentile overlays — plain values and bars

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Inverse - Other

Composite

Peer Group

Expense Ratio
0.95%
#NameTickerAUM
1ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude OilSCO$1B
2ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year TreasuryTBT$359M
3Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bear 3X SharesTMV$243M
4ProShares Short 20+ Year TreasuryTBF$142M
5Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bear 2X SharesDRIP$129M
6ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETFSBIT$128M
7ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural GasKOLD$123M
8ProShares UltraShort GoldGLL$108M
9Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bear 2X SharesDUST$98M
10ProShares UltraShort SilverZSL$91M
Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
Peer Group
7.4%7.4%30.3%0.12-20.1%
ⓘ Methodology

Peer composites equal-weight the group's share-class representatives' daily returns, including delisted members' alive-era history via the frozen year-end snapshots — though our coverage of closed funds is partial, so composite levels at older dates may run slightly high. Membership is the latest known — style migrators carry their full history. ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
Peer Group
-0.9%2.0%0.7%6.5%-9.3%2.3%7.4%-18.6%-19.5%-7.5%-7.5%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
1995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
Peer Group
-14.5%*7.5%-5.6%-4.6%20.4%-13.7%1.4%-16.8%-1.9%-8.7%-4.2%3.7%-5.6%-19.7%-11.7%-26.5%-21.4%-5.7%28.7%-6.5%16.3%-32.9%-10.3%10.5%-20.0%-21.1%-8.9%10.8%0.5%-13.9%-28.4%-0.9%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
US
Peer Group
-3.3%-1.31**0.29-0.020.67**-0.380.67**1.29**0.60226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Type
82% ETF, 18% Mutual Fund
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Inverse
Region
Peer Group
Inverse - Other (33 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
45
3Y Peer Percentile
48
Expense Ratio
0.95%
Median Member AUM
$26M
3Y Flow
+334.6%
Yield
2.20%
Inception
3/3/1995
Holdings (Reported)
505
Turnover
0%
Equity
0%
Derivatives
3%
Net Equity Exposure
-96%
ⓘ Methodology

Every figure on this card is an equal-weight aggregate over the composite's share-class-deduped members: the median across the members reporting each field, blank where too few of them do. Three rows depart from that, because a median of them would say nothing: Inception is the group's OLDEST member — where its combined history can start; 3Y Flow is the group's own net flow over its own assets, not the middle member's rate; and Type, Asset Class and Region are compositions by member count. Holdings is the merged look-through book — distinct positions across the members' holdings.

Composite Factors

Not scored — PEER:Inverse - Other’s holdings don’t clear the coverage floor for composite factor scores.

Factor Details

None of the selected metrics are scored for PEER:Inverse - Other — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Asset Class Exposure

Alternatives69.7%
No Holdings Data30.3%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares of the fund's long book, from the asset category each position is filed under. 30.3% of this book sits in funds we hold no holdings file for and is drawn as its own slice. Alternatives holds funds counted by what they are rather than by what they hold - alternative strategies, and funds that are short. A pie cannot draw a negative, and adding a hedge to the class it offsets would make it look like more of that class.

Country Exposure

Level

Based on holdings that carry a country (23% of total assets).

United States100.0%
United States100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

10 of 33 funds (top 10 shown, create for all 33)

#NameTickerWeight %AUM
1ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude OilSCO
3.03
$1B
2ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year TreasuryTBT
3.03
$359M
3Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bear 3X SharesTMV
3.03
$243M
4ProShares Short 20+ Year TreasuryTBF
3.03
$142M
5Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bear 2X SharesDRIP
3.03
$129M
6ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETFSBIT
3.03
$128M
7ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural GasKOLD
3.03
$123M
8ProShares UltraShort GoldGLL
3.03
$108M
9Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bear 2X SharesDUST
3.03
$98M
10ProShares UltraShort SilverZSL
3.03
$91M
ⓘ Methodology

The funds this composite is made of, each counting once (100 ÷ 10 — the same equal weighting behind its returns and its median exposures), listed largest first by assets. Tick Look-Through to expand them into the stocks they hold. Holdings Concentration beside this card always describes that looked-through book, not this list — it is a statement about exposure, not about the roster. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Concentration

Total Holdings505
Effective Holdings6.6
Top 10 Weight50.4%
Max Position14.7%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)0%
Top Country (of Net Assets)100%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Every row on this card describes the composite's merged look-through book — the stocks its members hold — not the list of member funds, whatever the Holdings card is showing.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
Inverse - Other Composite
33 funds
Peer Asset Class
221 funds
YTD Return
-0.65%-21.64%82
1Y Return
7.61%-20.54%87
3Y Return (Ann.)
-1.98%-26.23%87
5Y Return (Ann.)
0.88%-15.20%84
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.95%1.00%58
ⓘ Methodology

Inverse - Other Composite is a Sparkline peer composite — its members are the share-class representatives of the funds in the group (one class per fund: the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class). This card ranks it against its asset class, Inverse, which is the only pool a composite has: there is no peer group of peer groups, and the region tier is a fund-level grouping. Typical Member rows are medians across those representatives — the value is the group’s median, and the percentile is the median of the members’ own ranks within Inverse, so both describe the middle fund rather than the group as a whole. Quartile chips fill the layer the rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). A dash is a window the group is younger than, or one too few Inverse funds have a history for to rank against — hover it for which.