© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

Build a portfolio from scratch — the page previews it live

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

No percentile overlays — plain values and bars

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Developed Ex-US SMID Growth

Composite

Peer Group

Expense Ratio
1.14%
#NameTickerAUM
1Artisan International Small-Mid FundARTJX$2.7B
2Columbia Acorn InternationalACINX$771M
3Brown Capital Management International Small Company FundBCSFX$635M
4Columbia Variable Portfolio - Acorn International FundWSCAX$274M
5VanEck Israel ETFISRA$158M
6Royce International Premier FundRYIPX$66M
7Alger International Small Cap FundAFAIX$4M
8Wasatch International Select FundWAISX$3M
Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
Peer Group
0.7%0.7%15.4%-0.20-12.6%
ⓘ Methodology

Peer composites equal-weight the group's share-class representatives' daily returns, including delisted members' alive-era history via the frozen year-end snapshots — though our coverage of closed funds is partial, so composite levels at older dates may run slightly high. Membership is the latest known — style migrators carry their full history. ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
Peer Group
3.1%-1.4%-0.4%-3.0%-0.6%6.7%0.7%4.9%10.5%-0.3%9.3%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
1992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
Peer Group
6.9%*49.1%-4.3%22.5%26.1%-1.8%15.9%99.9%-27.6%-33.1%-10.7%51.5%28.5%23.1%35.0%16.2%-47.6%53.1%20.7%-15.2%25.4%23.2%-5.6%5.2%-3.0%33.6%-15.6%30.1%23.5%12.1%-27.5%11.7%1.6%12.4%3.1%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
Dev Ex-US
Peer Group
-2.6%0.77**-0.17-0.22-0.58**-0.80**-0.090.090.67226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Dev Ex-US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). Fama-French publishes daily factors for developed markets only, so Dev Ex-US is developed markets excluding the US and Global Dev is developed markets including it; emerging markets, a small share of world market capitalization, are not covered by the source data. From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

Factor History

Developed Ex-US SMID Growth Composite

No metrics selected — use Add metric to chart factors over time.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Type
88% Mutual Fund, 12% ETF
Asset Class
Equity
Region
Equity Size & Style
Peer Group Benchmark
Peer Group
Developed Ex-US SMID Growth (8 peers)
Expense Ratio
1.14%
5Y Tax Drag
0.35%/yr
Median Member AUM
$216M
3Y Flow
-59.9%
Yield
0.79%
Inception
9/23/1992
Holdings (Reported)
387
Turnover
26%
Equity
98%
Derivatives
0%
Net Equity Exposure
98%
ⓘ Methodology

Every figure on this card is an equal-weight aggregate over the composite's share-class-deduped members: the median across the members reporting each field, blank where too few of them do. Three rows depart from that, because a median of them would say nothing: Inception is the group's OLDEST member — where its combined history can start; 3Y Flow is the group's own net flow over its own assets, not the middle member's rate; and Type, Asset Class and Region are compositions by member count. Holdings is the merged look-through book — distinct positions across the members' holdings.

Equity Size & Style Map

LargeMidSmall
-
4%
4%
1%
4%
16%
13%
24%
34%
Large
ValueCoreGrowth
Size
Large
8%
Mid
21%
Small
71%
Style
Value
14%
Core
32%
Growth
54%
ⓘ Methodology

Equity size and style definitions: Large vs. Small based on market cap, where Large > $70B, Mid $10-70B, and Small < $10B. Value vs. Growth based on percentile ranking on Traditional Value score within the fund's region and size cohort (equal thirds among its true equity-fund peers). Cell shading and percentages: share of classified holdings weight per box, from stock-level classification (size on the same $70B/$10B lines; value by Traditional Value terciles across scored stocks). The dot is the average holding ranked against other funds, so dot and weights can differ at the margin. The Size and Style bars are the grid's row and column totals. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Composite Factors

Intangible Value11.0
Traditional Value47.4
Small-Cap79.0
Quality56.5
Momentum41.5
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Ranked within the clean equity fund universe, one entry per fund series (lowest: 0, highest: 100; the middle of the range is denser than the ends). Blue dots mark the fund's universe-normalized score; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Factor Details

Valuation
Book-to-Price (NTM)30.1
Sales-to-Price (NTM)43.1
Earnings-to-Price (NTM)4.5
Innovation/IP
R&D / Mkt Cap1.7
Patents / Mkt Cap1.3
Brand
Sales & Marketing / Mkt Cap2.6
Trademarks / Mkt Cap0.13
Human Capital
PhD Employees / Mkt Cap3.0
Top University Alumni / Mkt Cap2.9
Politics
Lobbying Spend / Mkt Cap0.71
AI
AI Employees / Mkt Cap0.61
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Asset Class Exposure

Equity96.6%
Cash & Short-Term3.4%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares of the fund's long book, from the asset category each position is filed under. Cash & Short-Term includes 1.2% of net assets the filing does not itemise.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

8 funds

#NameTickerWeight %AUM
1Artisan International Small-Mid FundARTJX
12.50
$2.7B
2Columbia Acorn InternationalACINX
12.50
$771M
3Brown Capital Management International Small Company FundBCSFX
12.50
$635M
4Columbia Variable Portfolio - Acorn International FundWSCAX
12.50
$274M
5VanEck Israel ETFISRA
12.50
$158M
6Royce International Premier FundRYIPX
12.50
$66M
7Alger International Small Cap FundAFAIX
12.50
$4M
8Wasatch International Select FundWAISX
12.50
$3M
ⓘ Methodology

The funds this composite is made of, each counting once (100 ÷ 8 — the same equal weighting behind its returns and its median exposures), listed largest first by assets. Tick Look-Through to expand them into the stocks they hold. Holdings Concentration beside this card always describes that looked-through book, not this list — it is a statement about exposure, not about the roster. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Concentration

Total Holdings387
Effective Holdings205.5
Top 10 Weight11.8%
Max Position1.6%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)0%
Top Country (of Net Assets)0%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Every row on this card describes the composite's merged look-through book — the stocks its members hold — not the list of member funds, whatever the Holdings card is showing.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
Developed Ex-US SMID Growth Composite
8 funds
Peer Asset Class
5,640 funds
YTD Return
4.35%11.63%19
1Y Return
1.64%14.46%12
3Y Return (Ann.)
7.50%18.47%5
5Y Return (Ann.)
-2.47%8.64%4
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
1.14%0.74%19
ⓘ Methodology

Developed Ex-US SMID Growth Composite is a Sparkline peer composite — its members are the share-class representatives of the funds in the group (one class per fund: the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class). This card ranks it against its asset class, Equity, which is the only pool a composite has: there is no peer group of peer groups, and the region tier is a fund-level grouping. Typical Member rows are medians across those representatives — the value is the group’s median, and the percentile is the median of the members’ own ranks within Equity, so both describe the middle fund rather than the group as a whole. Quartile chips fill the layer the rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). A dash is a window the group is younger than, or one too few Equity funds have a history for to rank against — hover it for which.