Peer Group
| # | Name | Ticker | AUM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | DBA | $1.4B |
| 2 | Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | PDBA | $489M |
| 3 | Teucrium Wheat Fund | WEAT | $284M |
| 4 | Teucrium Corn Fund | CORN | $130M |
| 5 | Teucrium Sugar Fund | CANE | $53M |
| 6 | Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | TILL | $48M |
| 7 | Teucrium Soybean Fund | SOYB | $45M |
| 8 | Teucrium Agricultural Fund | TAGS | $21M |
| Name | Cumulative Return | Ann. Return | Ann. Vol | Sharpe | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peer Group | 17.2% | 17.2% | 13.0% | 1.03 | -9.2% |
Peer composites equal-weight the group's share-class representatives' daily returns, including delisted members' alive-era history via the frozen year-end snapshots — though our coverage of closed funds is partial, so composite levels at older dates may run slightly high. Membership is the latest known — style migrators carry their full history. ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.
Name | YTD | 1D | 5D | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 2Y | 3Y | 5Y | MAX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peer Group | 19.3% | -1.1% | 2.3% | -1.1% | 10.2% | 11.6% | 17.2% | 4.4% | 1.3% | 4.1% | -0.4% |
ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.
Name | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | YTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peer Group | 33.7% | -19.1% | 1.0% | 27.1% | -0.8% | -5.7% | -21.3% | -7.4% | -20.1% | -2.0% | -12.2% | -10.9% | -2.4% | 6.7% | 27.7% | 14.0% | -2.5% | -3.9% | -6.2% | 19.3% |
ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.
Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.
Name | Ann. α | β MKT | β SMB | β HML | β RMW | β CMA | β UMD | β iHML | R² | Obs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
US Peer Group | 17.3% | -0.05 | -0.22 | 0.08 | -0.14 | -0.10 | -0.07 | -0.02 | 0.03 | 226 |
ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.
Every figure on this card is an equal-weight aggregate over the composite's share-class-deduped members: the median across the members reporting each field, blank where too few of them do. Three rows depart from that, because a median of them would say nothing: Inception is the group's OLDEST member — where its combined history can start; 3Y Flow is the group's own net flow over its own assets, not the middle member's rate; and Type, Asset Class and Region are compositions by member count. Holdings is the merged look-through book — distinct positions across the members' holdings.
Not scored — PEER:Commodities - Agriculture’s holdings don’t clear the coverage floor for composite factor scores.
None of the selected metrics are scored for PEER:Commodities - Agriculture — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).
Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.
8 funds
| # | Name | Ticker | Weight % | AUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | DBA | 12.50 | $1.4B |
| 2 | Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | PDBA | 12.50 | $489M |
| 3 | Teucrium Wheat Fund | WEAT | 12.50 | $284M |
| 4 | Teucrium Corn Fund | CORN | 12.50 | $130M |
| 5 | Teucrium Sugar Fund | CANE | 12.50 | $53M |
| 6 | Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | TILL | 12.50 | $48M |
| 7 | Teucrium Soybean Fund | SOYB | 12.50 | $45M |
| 8 | Teucrium Agricultural Fund | TAGS | 12.50 | $21M |
The funds this composite is made of, each counting once (100 ÷ 8 — the same equal weighting behind its returns and its median exposures), listed largest first by assets. Tick Look-Through to expand them into the stocks they hold. Holdings Concentration beside this card always describes that looked-through book, not this list — it is a statement about exposure, not about the roster. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.
Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Every row on this card describes the composite's merged look-through book — the stocks its members hold — not the list of member funds, whatever the Holdings card is showing.
Metric | Commodities - Agriculture Composite 8 funds | Peer Asset Class 113 funds |
|---|---|---|
YTD Return | 22.09% | 19.73%53 |
1Y Return | 17.16% | 24.77%38 |
3Y Return (Ann.) | -2.53% | 17.14%8 |
5Y Return (Ann.) | 2.83% | 11.86%13 |
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper | 3.17% | 0.71%4 |
Commodities - Agriculture Composite is a Sparkline peer composite — its members are the share-class representatives of the funds in the group (one class per fund: the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class). This card ranks it against its asset class, Commodities, which is the only pool a composite has: there is no peer group of peer groups, and the region tier is a fund-level grouping. Typical Member rows are medians across those representatives — the value is the group’s median, and the percentile is the median of the members’ own ranks within Commodities, so both describe the middle fund rather than the group as a whole. Quartile chips fill the layer the rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). A dash is a window the group is younger than, or one too few Commodities funds have a history for to rank against — hover it for which.