© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

Build a portfolio from scratch — the page previews it live

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

No percentile overlays — plain values and bars

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Alts - Managed Futures/CTA

Composite

Peer Group

Expense Ratio
1.20%
#NameTickerAUM
1Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy FundMBXAX$11.5B
2iMGP DBI Managed Futures Strategy ETFDBMF$5.2B
3AQR Managed Futures Strategy FundAQMIX$3.7B
4Campbell Systematic Macro FundEBSAX$2.4B
5American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy FundAHLAX$2.4B
6AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV FundQMHIX$2.1B
7PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy FundPQTAX$1.7B
8Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETFCTA$1.3B
9Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy FundASFCX$963M
10Return Stacked(R) U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETFRSST$576M
Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
Peer Group
17.6%17.6%9.6%1.44-5.1%
ⓘ Methodology

Peer composites equal-weight the group's share-class representatives' daily returns, including delisted members' alive-era history via the frozen year-end snapshots — though our coverage of closed funds is partial, so composite levels at older dates may run slightly high. Membership is the latest known — style migrators carry their full history. ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/8/2025 to 10/8/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
Peer Group
15.5%-0.1%0.4%2.8%6.9%8.2%17.6%11.2%6.9%8.4%3.7%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/8/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
Peer Group
7.1%*8.5%-4.3%3.3%-4.7%-4.8%5.0%12.3%0.5%-3.9%4.4%-6.6%5.0%3.3%6.4%22.8%-1.6%5.6%3.8%15.5%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/8/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
Global Dev
Peer Group
-1.6%0.31**-0.090.63**-0.22-0.38*0.090.000.37225
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Global Dev factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). Fama-French publishes daily factors for developed markets only, so Dev Ex-US is developed markets excluding the US and Global Dev is developed markets including it; emerging markets, a small share of world market capitalization, are not covered by the source data. From 10/8/2025 to 8/31/2026.

Factor History

Alts - Managed Futures/CTA Composite

No metrics selected — use Add metric to chart factors over time.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Type
51% Mutual Fund, 49% ETF
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Alternatives
Region
79% , 12% , 6% , …
Peer Group Benchmark
Peer Group
Alts - Managed Futures/CTA (35 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
48
3Y Peer Percentile
48
Expense Ratio
1.20%
Median Member AUM
$237M
3Y Flow
+78.6%
Yield
2.44%
Inception
2/22/2007
Holdings (Reported)
26,999
Turnover
0%
Equity
2%
Derivatives
0%
ⓘ Methodology

Every figure on this card is an equal-weight aggregate over the composite's share-class-deduped members: the median across the members reporting each field, blank where too few of them do. Three rows depart from that, because a median of them would say nothing: Inception is the group's OLDEST member — where its combined history can start; 3Y Flow is the group's own net flow over its own assets, not the middle member's rate; and Type, Asset Class and Region are compositions by member count. Holdings is the merged look-through book — distinct positions across the members' holdings.

Composite Factors

Not scored — PEER:Alts - Managed Futures/CTA’s holdings don’t clear the coverage floor for composite factor scores.

Factor Details

Based on equity exposure only (25% of total assets).

None of the selected metrics are scored for PEER:Alts - Managed Futures/CTA — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. 22 of this group's 35 funds hold too little equity to count.

Asset Class Exposure

Alternatives100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares of the fund's long book, from the asset category each position is filed under. Alternatives holds funds counted by what they are rather than by what they hold - alternative strategies, and funds that are short. A pie cannot draw a negative, and adding a hedge to the class it offsets would make it look like more of that class.

Country Exposure

Level

Based on holdings that carry a country (48% of total assets).

United States87.7%
United States86.9%
Other0.8%
Developed Ex-US11.0%
Japan2.1%
United Kingdom2.0%
Canada1.4%
Other5.5%
Emerging Markets1.3%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Sector Exposure

Level

Based on equity exposure only (25% of total assets).

Financials22.7%
Industrials21.4%
Technology20.5%
Consumer Discretionary7.4%
Healthcare6.7%
Materials5.1%
Communication4.4%
Energy3.6%
Consumer Staples3.5%
Utilities2.5%
Real Estate2.1%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the fund's classified holdings — every position we can identify, with cash and unidentified positions excluded — not portfolio weights. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. 22 of this group's 35 funds hold too little equity to count.

Thematic Exposure

Based on equity exposure only (25% of total assets).

Old vs New Economy

Old Economy68.1%
New Economy31.9%

China Exposure

China/HK Domiciled0.4%
Revenue & Operations10.4%
Operations Only13.1%
Revenue Only4.7%
No Material Exposure71.3%

Company Size

Mega (>$500B)12.9%
Large ($70–500B)27.2%
Mid ($10–70B)37.4%
Small ($1–10B)20.6%
Micro (<$1B)1.9%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the fund's classified equity book, renormalized so each split sums to 100% (the equity book is 2% of net assets) — they are not portfolio weights. China exposure: domiciled = incorporated in China or Hong Kong, falling back to the filing's country for holdings outside the stock model. Among the rest, revenue = ≥15% of revenue derived from China; operations = ≥3% of LinkedIn-tracked workforce in China, or ≥2 identified Chinese suppliers making up ≥12% of those identified. China revenue is estimated where segment reporting is absent. Company size bands by holding market cap: Mega >$500B, Large $70–500B, Mid $10–70B, Small $1–10B, Micro <$1B. Old vs New Economy partitions Sparkline's 48 industries: New = technology, internet platforms and entertainment, e-commerce, payments, pharma/biotech/medtech, and renewable energy; Old = everything else. Shares are of classified holdings and sum to 100%. China shares are of total equity weight. Size shares are of scored holdings weight. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. 22 of this group's 35 funds hold too little equity to count.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

10 of 35 funds (top 10 shown, create for all 35)

#NameTickerWeight %AUM
1Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy FundMBXAX
2.86
$11.5B
2iMGP DBI Managed Futures Strategy ETFDBMF
2.86
$5.2B
3AQR Managed Futures Strategy FundAQMIX
2.86
$3.7B
4Campbell Systematic Macro FundEBSAX
2.86
$2.4B
5American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy FundAHLAX
2.86
$2.4B
6AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV FundQMHIX
2.86
$2.1B
7PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy FundPQTAX
2.86
$1.7B
8Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETFCTA
2.86
$1.3B
9Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy FundASFCX
2.86
$963M
10Return Stacked(R) U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETFRSST
2.86
$576M
ⓘ Methodology

The funds this composite is made of, each counting once (100 ÷ 10 — the same equal weighting behind its returns and its median exposures), listed largest first by assets. Tick Look-Through to expand them into the stocks they hold. Holdings Concentration beside this card always describes that looked-through book, not this list — it is a statement about exposure, not about the roster. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Concentration

Total Holdings26,999
Effective Holdings50.9
Top 10 Weight34.4%
Max Position8.7%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)23%
Top Country (of Net Assets)87%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range; percentile overlays are off (Peer Universe: None). Every row on this card describes the composite's merged look-through book — the stocks its members hold — not the list of member funds, whatever the Holdings card is showing.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
Alts - Managed Futures/CTA Composite
35 funds
Peer Asset Class
251 funds
YTD Return
15.43%7.53%78
1Y Return
17.90%8.90%78
3Y Return (Ann.)
7.24%9.38%35
5Y Return (Ann.)
7.24%5.15%67
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
1.20%1.42%59
ⓘ Methodology

Alts - Managed Futures/CTA Composite is a Sparkline peer composite — its members are the share-class representatives of the funds in the group (one class per fund: the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class). This card ranks it against its asset class, Alternatives, which is the only pool a composite has: there is no peer group of peer groups, and the region tier is a fund-level grouping. Typical Member rows are medians across those representatives — the value is the group’s median, and the percentile is the median of the members’ own ranks within Alternatives, so both describe the middle fund rather than the group as a whole. Quartile chips fill the layer the rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). A dash is a window the group is younger than, or one too few Alternatives funds have a history for to rank against — hover it for which.