© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

VYLD

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Alternatives Funds · 251 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

VYLD

ETNInverse

Inverse VIX Short-Term Futures ETNs due March 22, 2045

Expense Ratio
0.85%
AUM
$4M
Inception
3/21/2025
1Y Return
+14.3%65th %ilevs 251 asset-class peers

The index tracks the daily “points-change” return from a rolling synthetic short position in the underlying futures contracts trading on the Cboe Futures Exchange. The notes are designed for investors who seek a positive return when the level of the index appreciates during their holding period.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
VYLD
Inverse VIX Short-Term Futures ETNs due March 22, 2045
14.3%14.3%11.9%0.89-8.9%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
VYLD
Inverse VIX Short-Term Futures ETNs due March 22, 2045
8.8%0.0%0.8%1.2%3.4%14.9%14.3%14.1%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
2025YTD
VYLD
Inverse VIX Short-Term Futures ETNs due March 22, 2045
12.6%*8.8%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
VYLDUS
Inverse VIX Short-Term Futures ETNs due March 22, 2045
1.9%0.83**0.000.110.11*0.010.01-0.060.67224
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund ProfileInverse

Family
Type
ETF
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Alternatives
Peer Group Benchmark
Structure
Exchange-Traded Note
Underlying
S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Points Change Inverse Daily Index TR
Peer Group
Alts - Short Volatility (6 peers)
Expense Ratio
0.85%
AUM
$4M
Yield
0.00%
Inception
3/21/2025
Turnover
0%
Strategy Summary

The index tracks the daily “points-change” return from a rolling synthetic short position in the underlying futures contracts trading on the Cboe Futures Exchange. The notes are designed for investors who seek a positive return when the level of the index appreciates during their holding period.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio from the sponsor's website. Turnover from market data (10/6/2026). Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Summary may be from an older prospectus.

VYLD is an ETN, not a registered fund, so it files no holdings report.

Factor DetailsRef: Alternatives Funds

VYLD has no stock-level metrics. Fund-level metrics such as AUM and expense ratio are available in the picker.

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Alternatives Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
VYLD
Inverse VIX Short-Term Futures ETNs due March 22, 2045
Peer Group
6 funds
Peer Asset Class
251 funds
YTD Return
8.80%-7.46%57
1Y Return
14.35%-9.54%65
3Y Return (Ann.)
---
5Y Return (Ann.)
---
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.85%-1.42%81
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (7 share classes across 6 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Consensus Rank
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Factor Match
Top Return Corr
Top FF Match

Scanning every fund's holdings, factor profile and return history for matches with VYLD… first view of a fund takes a few seconds.

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of those universe ranks (#1.0 = the top match on every method). A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Consensus Rank is simply the #1 row's figure, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Factor Similarity = 100 − a signature-weighted RMS gap across the composite factor scores (0–100 ranks within the clean equity fund universe), each axis weighted by how far this fund sits from the universe median of 50. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days). Fama-French Similarity = 1/(1+d), where d is the Euclidean distance between factor betas (market, size, value, profitability, investment, momentum, intangible value) from up to three years of daily returns (min 378 daily observations and regression R² of at least 0.25); 1.00 = identical loadings.