© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

STBF

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Fixed Income Funds · 2,838 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

STBF

Performance Trust Short Term Bond ETF

Expense Ratio
0.65%
AUM
$82M
Inception
4/10/2024
1Y Return
+2.5%86th %ilevs 2,838 asset-class peers
·

The fund invests at least 80% of net assets in bonds or derivatives with similar economic characteristics, primarily focusing on investment grade quality securities rated BBB/Baa or higher, while allowing up to 30% in below investment-grade securities. It employs a value-oriented strategy guided by Shape Management, analyzing bonds across various interest rate scenarios, with a target dollar-weighted average portfolio duration of 4 or less. The fund may engage in active trading and utilize derivatives to manage investment risks.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
STBF
Performance Trust Short Term Bond ETF
2.5%2.5%1.6%-0.78-1.1%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
STBF
Performance Trust Short Term Bond ETF
1.5%0.1%0.3%-0.7%-0.4%0.8%2.5%4.2%5.0%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
20242025YTD
STBF
Performance Trust Short Term Bond ETF
4.6%*6.3%1.5%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
STBFUS
Performance Trust Short Term Bond ETF
-0.5%0.04**0.03*-0.020.000.02-0.01-0.020.19226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Family
Registrant
Type
ETF
Asset Class
Fixed Income
Region
Peer Group Benchmark
Peer Group
Fixed Income - Short-Term (168 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
86
Expense Ratio
0.65%
AUM
$82M
Yield
4.79%
Inception
4/10/2024
Holdings (Reported)
211
Turnover
44%
Equity
0%
Derivatives
0%
Net Equity Exposure
0%
Strategy Summary

The fund invests at least 80% of net assets in bonds or derivatives with similar economic characteristics, primarily focusing on investment grade quality securities rated BBB/Baa or higher, while allowing up to 30% in below investment-grade securities. It employs a value-oriented strategy guided by Shape Management, analyzing bonds across various interest rate scenarios, with a target dollar-weighted average portfolio duration of 4 or less. The fund may engage in active trading and utilize derivatives to manage investment risks.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the fund's prospectus fee table. Turnover from the fund's prospectus. Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 5/31/2026. Strategy summary from the fund's prospectus.

Factor DetailsRef: Fixed Income Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for STBF — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Fixed Income Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 5/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Country Exposure

Level
100.0%
78.0%
Other22.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 5/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

211 positions (top 10 shown, create for full holdings)

#NameWeight %Country
1Treasury Bill
2.49
USA
2Treasury Bill
2.48
USA
3Treasury Bill
2.47
USA
4Treasury Bill
2.46
USA
5US Treasury N/B
1.65
USA
6US Treasury N/B
1.65
USA
7US Treasury N/B
1.65
USA
8US Treasury N/B
1.19
USA
9Santander Drive Auto Receivabl
0.83
USA
10Santander Drive Auto Receivabl
0.82
USA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. Holdings as of 5/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Fixed Income Funds

Total Holdings211
Effective Holdings139.4
Top 10 Weight17.7%
Max Position2.5%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)92%
Top Country (of Net Assets)79%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Fixed Income Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 5/31/2026.

Benchmark DifferentiationRef: Fixed Income Funds

vs AGGBroad Benchmark
Tracking Error3.9%
Benchmark Correlation0.59
ⓘ Methodology

One sub-card per benchmark: the market primary, then the style secondary — the gap between them is the style sleeve itself. Both anchors are Sparkline-inferred (market from asset class and region, style from the holdings size-and-style map), not the fund's official prospectus benchmark. Solid blue dot marks the fund; the shaded band spans the reference set's 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median (band follows the Peer Universe selector). Active Share compares the fund's book with the benchmark's, share for share; Tracking Error is the annualized daily deviation over the trailing two years (ruler runs to just past the universe's 95th percentile, or past the fund's own figure where that is larger); Benchmark Correlation is the plain daily correlation over the trailing year. Hover the labels for full definitions.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
STBF
Performance Trust Short Term Bond ETF
Peer Group
168 funds
Peer Asset Class
2,838 funds
YTD Return
1.48%0.53%86-2.33%88
1Y Return
2.55%1.59%86-1.51%86
3Y Return (Ann.)
---
5Y Return (Ann.)
---
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.65%0.44%260.52%39
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (530 share classes across 168 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity43
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Return Corr
FundPeer Group
1PTCRX
Performance Trust Multisector Bond Fund
Fixed Income - Unconstrained
Fixed Income - Unconstrained
43---
2PTIAX
Performance Trust Total Return Bond Fund
Fixed Income - Core
Fixed Income - Core
32---
3EDGF
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
Cash & Ultra-Short
Cash & Ultra-Short
9---
4HSNAX
THE HARTFORD STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
Fixed Income - Unconstrained
Fixed Income - Unconstrained
9---
5PIASX
PIA Short-Term Securities Fund
Fixed Income - Short-Term
Fixed Income - Short-Term
8---
6CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
Cash & Ultra-Short
Cash & Ultra-Short
5---
7LIGRX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund
Fixed Income - Core
Fixed Income - Core
5---
8SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Cash & Ultra-Short
Cash & Ultra-Short
5---
9BAMU
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Cash & Ultra-Short
Cash & Ultra-Short
5---
10VGUS
VANGUARD ULTRA-SHORT TREASURY ETF
Cash & Ultra-Short
Cash & Ultra-Short
4---

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 5/31/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days).