© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

SBFCX

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Asset Allocation Funds · 1,365 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

SBFCX

Victory Investment Grade Convertible Fund

Expense Ratio
1.27%
AUM
$222M
Inception
4/14/1988
1Y Return
-1.2%3rd %ilevs 1,365 asset-class peers
·

The fund invests primarily in securities convertible into common stocks, including convertible bonds, notes, and preferred stocks, and will invest at least 80% of its assets in investment-grade securities convertible into common stock and synthetic convertible securities. These investment-grade securities are rated within the four highest categories by a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization, while up to 20% may be in below-investment-grade securities. The investment process emphasizes strong underlying equity potential and may focus on sectors such as financials.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
SBFCX
Victory Investment Grade Convertible Fund
-1.2%-1.2%6.7%-0.74-7.3%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
SBFCX
Victory Investment Grade Convertible Fund
-1.3%-0.6%-0.1%-4.4%-5.8%-0.3%-1.2%1.9%6.4%2.1%6.6%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
19881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
SBFCX
Victory Investment Grade Convertible Fund
2.2%*16.8%-5.2%25.8%9.0%17.8%-10.1%20.9%19.6%16.4%-0.7%11.8%14.1%-3.9%-7.7%20.5%6.6%1.5%8.9%-1.5%-30.8%27.5%10.2%-4.4%8.8%20.4%11.8%-1.1%5.4%18.5%-0.4%19.8%11.3%10.9%-11.6%8.0%9.5%5.1%-1.3%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
SBFCXUS
Victory Investment Grade Convertible Fund
-5.5%0.40**0.040.13**-0.05*0.10**-0.06*-0.10**0.59226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Fund Documents(opens the fund company’s site in a new tab)
Family
Registrant
Type
Mutual Fund
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Asset Allocation
Region
Peer Group Benchmark
Prospectus Benchmark
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index
Peer Group
Allocation - Conservative (170 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
8
3Y Peer Percentile
26
Expense Ratio
1.27%
5Y Tax Drag
1.61%/yr
AUM
$222M
3Y Flow
+17.2%
Yield
2.63%
Inception
4/14/1988
Holdings (Reported)
61
Turnover
27%
Equity
28%
Derivatives
0%
Net Equity Exposure
29%
Strategy Summary

The fund invests primarily in securities convertible into common stocks, including convertible bonds, notes, and preferred stocks, and will invest at least 80% of its assets in investment-grade securities convertible into common stock and synthetic convertible securities. These investment-grade securities are rated within the four highest categories by a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization, while up to 20% may be in below-investment-grade securities. The investment process emphasizes strong underlying equity potential and may focus on sectors such as financials.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the fund's prospectus fee table; tax drag from its after-tax return table. Turnover from the SEC annual report (9/3/2026). Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 6/30/2026. Strategy summary from the fund's prospectus.

Factor DetailsRef: Asset Allocation Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for SBFCX — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Asset Allocation Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Asset Class Exposure

Fixed Income95.8%
Cash & Short-Term4.2%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares of the fund's long book, from the asset category each position is filed under.

Country Exposure

Level
96.2%
96.2%
3.8%
3.8%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

61 positions (top 10 shown, create for full holdings)

#NameTickerWeight %SectorIndustryCountry
1Bank OF AmericaBAC
5.09
FinancialsMultinational BanksUSA
2Uber TechnologiesUBER
5.00
TechnologySoftwareUSA
3Welltower OP-
4.84
--USA
4Wells Fargo & CompanyWFC
4.50
FinancialsMultinational BanksUSA
5Vishay IntertechnologyVSH
4.43
TechnologyTechnology HardwareUSA
6Meritage HomesMTH
4.09
Consumer DiscHome & LeisureUSA
7Envista HoldingsNVST
3.74
HealthcareMedical TechnologyUSA
8Barclays Bank-
3.69
--GBR
9Nextera EnergyNEE
3.33
UtilitiesRegulated UtilitiesUSA
10The Southern CompanySO
3.33
UtilitiesRegulated UtilitiesUSA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Asset Allocation Funds

Total Holdings61
Effective Holdings35.4
Top 10 Weight42.0%
Max Position5.1%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)27%
Top Country (of Net Assets)98%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Asset Allocation Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
SBFCX
Victory Investment Grade Convertible Fund
Peer Group
170 funds
Peer Asset Class
1,365 funds
YTD Return
-1.26%2.04%87.49%3
1Y Return
-1.16%3.50%89.48%3
3Y Return (Ann.)
6.39%8.36%2614.21%6
5Y Return (Ann.)
2.08%3.05%246.38%6
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
1.27%0.94%210.80%16
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (488 share classes across 170 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity64
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Return Corr
Top FF Match
FundPeer Group
1PBXAX
Rational/Pier 88 Convertible Securities Fund
Allocation - Moderate
Allocation - Moderate
64----
2PFFD
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock
43----
3PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock
43----
4CFIAX
Columbia Flexible Capital Income Fund
Allocation - Moderate
Allocation - Moderate
26----
5ERH
ALLSPRING UTILITIES & HIGH INCOME FUND
Sector - Utilities
Sector - Utilities
26----
6RYAUX
Utilities Fund
Sector - Utilities
Sector - Utilities
26----
7CCD
Calamos Dynamic Convertible & Income Fund
Fixed Income - Convertibles
Fixed Income - Convertibles
26----
8FKUTX
Franklin Utilities Fund
Sector - Utilities
Sector - Utilities
26----
9FASDX
Fidelity Strategic Dividend and Income Fund
Allocation - Aggressive
Allocation - Aggressive
21----
10EVUAX
Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund
Sector - Utilities
Sector - Utilities
21----

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days). Fama-French Similarity = 1/(1+d), where d is the Euclidean distance between factor betas (market, size, value, profitability, investment, momentum, intangible value) from up to three years of daily returns (min 378 daily observations and regression R² of at least 0.25); 1.00 = identical loadings.