© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

RYMBX

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Commodities Funds · 113 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

RYMBX

Non-Diversified

Commodities Strategy Fund

Expense Ratio
1.72%
AUM
$41M
Inception
5/25/2005
1Y Return
+54.2%89th %ilevs 113 asset-class peers
·

The fund invests in commodity-linked derivative instruments and exchange-traded products to gain exposure to a composite index of commodity sector returns, representing an unleveraged long-only investment in commodities. It may invest up to 25% of total assets in a wholly-owned Cayman Islands subsidiary, which can invest more heavily in commodity-linked derivatives. The portfolio is expected to be significantly weighted toward oil, energy-related commodities, and agricultural commodities, while also holding U.S. government securities or cash equivalents for collateralization.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
RYMBX
Commodities Strategy Fund
54.2%54.2%26.3%1.92-18.7%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/8/2025 to 10/8/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
RYMBX
Commodities Strategy Fund
54.8%1.6%1.2%2.2%19.4%16.1%54.2%27.3%18.3%14.7%-1.5%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/8/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
RYMBX
Commodities Strategy Fund
11.6%*-18.1%31.6%-46.0%7.1%5.7%-3.7%-1.6%-3.5%-33.9%-34.6%10.5%4.6%-15.0%15.6%-23.0%39.0%23.7%-6.1%8.2%4.7%54.8%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/8/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
RYMBXUS
Commodities Strategy Fund
51.0%-0.52-0.74**0.56**-0.41*-0.35-0.25-0.260.17225
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/8/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund ProfileNon-Diversified

Fund Documents(opens the fund company’s site in a new tab)
Family
Registrant
Type
Mutual Fund
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Commodities
Region
Peer Group Benchmark
Prospectus Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
Peer Group
Commodities - Broad (52 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
91
3Y Peer Percentile
65
Expense Ratio
1.72%
5Y Tax Drag
3.72%/yr
AUM
$41M
3Y Flow
+356.6%
Yield
1.56%
Inception
5/25/2005
Holdings (Reported)
629
Non-Diversified
Yes
Turnover
0%
Equity
0%
Derivatives
-15%
Net Equity Exposure
0%
Strategy Summary

The fund invests in commodity-linked derivative instruments and exchange-traded products to gain exposure to a composite index of commodity sector returns, representing an unleveraged long-only investment in commodities. It may invest up to 25% of total assets in a wholly-owned Cayman Islands subsidiary, which can invest more heavily in commodity-linked derivatives. The portfolio is expected to be significantly weighted toward oil, energy-related commodities, and agricultural commodities, while also holding U.S. government securities or cash equivalents for collateralization.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the fund's prospectus fee table; tax drag from its after-tax return table. Turnover from the SEC annual report (3/6/2026). Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 6/30/2026. Strategy summary from the fund's prospectus.

Factor DetailsRef: Commodities Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for RYMBX — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Commodities Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Country Exposure

Level

Based on holdings that carry a country (43% of total assets).

99.0%
97.7%
Other1.3%
Other (2 regions)1.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

8 positions · 6.5% in funds

#NameTickerWeight %Country
1J.P. Morgan Securities-
20.91
USA
2Merrill LYNCH, Pierce, Fenner & Smith-
20.91
USA
3United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt-
20.07
USA
4United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt-
12.06
USA
5Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding-
4.02
USA
6Guggenheim Funds TrustGIYIX
3.29
USA
7Guggenheim Funds TrustGCSH
3.21
USA
8Chicago Mercantile Exchange-
-10.64
USA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. "In funds" adds up the rows tagged Fund — holdings that are themselves funds this app covers, which is what look-through can expand; a held vehicle that files no holdings of its own (a commodity or currency trust, a money-market fund) is not counted and stays a single line. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Commodities Funds

Total Holdings629
Effective Holdings4.9
Top 10 Weight84.5%
Max Position20.9%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)84%
Top Country (of Net Assets)84%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Commodities Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
RYMBX
Commodities Strategy Fund
Peer Group
52 funds
Peer Asset Class
113 funds
YTD Return
54.81%33.09%9219.33%89
1Y Return
54.24%39.16%9122.09%89
3Y Return (Ann.)
18.29%17.17%6518.03%53
5Y Return (Ann.)
14.73%11.61%8112.02%62
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
1.72%0.70%60.71%7
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (115 share classes across 52 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity61
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Return Corr
FundPeer Group
1PCLAX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
Commodities - Broad
Commodities - Broad
61---
2RYRLX
Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund
Leveraged - Equity
Leveraged - Equity
51---
3RYJUX
Inverse Government Long Bond Strategy Fund
Inverse - Other
Inverse - Other
43---
4RYMFX
Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Alts - Managed Futures/CTA
Alts - Managed Futures/CTA
43---
5RYIHX
Inverse High Yield Strategy Fund
Inverse - Other
Inverse - Other
43---
6RYURX
Inverse S&P 500 Strategy Fund
Inverse - Equity
Inverse - Equity
43---
7RYAIX
Inverse NASDAQ-100 Strategy Fund
Inverse - Equity
Inverse - Equity
43---
8RYCQX
Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund
Inverse - Equity
Inverse - Equity
42---
9RYMQX
Guggenheim Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund
Alts - Other
Alts - Other
42---
10HIPS
GraniteShares HIPS U.S. High Income ETF
Allocation - Moderate
Allocation - Moderate
37---

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days).