© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

RTAI

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Fixed Income Funds · 2,838 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

RTAI

Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF

Expense Ratio
4.59%
AUM
$16M
Inception
10/22/2020
1Y Return
-8.8%3rd %ilevs 2,838 asset-class peers
·

The fund invests primarily in unaffiliated closed-end funds registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, focusing on municipal bond closed-end funds trading at a discount or premium to their underlying net asset value (NAV) that pay regular cash distributions. It may allocate up to 30% of its assets to municipal or short-term Treasury exchange-traded funds (ETFs) when deemed advantageous, and employs a dividend capture strategy to enhance income. The fund may also utilize derivatives for hedging and engages in frequent portfolio transactions, leading to a higher turnover rate.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
RTAI
Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF
-8.8%-8.8%8.1%-1.55-13.9%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
RTAI
Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF
-9.6%-1.8%-2.1%-9.5%-13.0%-8.9%-8.8%-4.2%6.3%-3.3%-0.7%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
202020212022202320242025YTD
RTAI
Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF
5.1%*10.3%-22.3%4.3%7.2%5.5%-9.6%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
RTAIUS
Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF
-3.4%0.20**0.14*-0.04-0.030.040.00-0.030.27226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Fund Documents(opens the fund company’s site in a new tab)
Family
Registrant
Type
ETF
Asset Class
Fixed Income
Region
Peer Group Benchmark
Prospectus Benchmark
Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index
Peer Group
Fixed Income - Core (657 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
3
3Y Peer Percentile
78
Expense Ratio
4.59%
5Y Tax Drag
0.65%/yr
AUM
$16M
3Y Flow
-2.9%
Yield
5.50%
Inception
10/22/2020
Holdings (Reported)
4,078
Turnover
51%
Equity
0%
Derivatives
0%
Net Equity Exposure
0%
Strategy Summary

The fund invests primarily in unaffiliated closed-end funds registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, focusing on municipal bond closed-end funds trading at a discount or premium to their underlying net asset value (NAV) that pay regular cash distributions. It may allocate up to 30% of its assets to municipal or short-term Treasury exchange-traded funds (ETFs) when deemed advantageous, and employs a dividend capture strategy to enhance income. The fund may also utilize derivatives for hedging and engages in frequent portfolio transactions, leading to a higher turnover rate.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the fund's prospectus fee table; tax drag from its after-tax return table. Turnover from the SEC annual report (12/9/2025). Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 6/30/2026. Strategy summary from the fund's prospectus.

Factor DetailsRef: Fixed Income Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for RTAI — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Fixed Income Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Asset Class Exposure

Fixed Income96.9%
Cash & Short-Term2.7%
Other0.4%
Short positions of 0.3% of net assets are not shown.ⓘ Methodology

Shares of the fund's long book, from the asset category each position is filed under. Holdings that are themselves funds are looked through one level to their own mix (100% of the book). Cash & Short-Term includes 1.9% of net assets the filing does not itemise. The short book is stated under the card and never netted into a slice: a pie cannot draw a negative, and folding a hedge into the class it offsets would make it look like more of that class. Other is everything we could not name as an asset class: holdings the filing itself labels as other, derivative positions at the market value the filing reports rather than at notional, and funds held inside this fund whose own holdings we could not read.

Country Exposure

Level
100.0%
99.6%
Other0.4%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

14 positions (top 10 shown, create for full holdings) · 97.7% in funds

#NameTickerWeight %Country
1BlackRock Muniholdings FundMHD
17.16
USA
2Blackrock Muniyield Quality Fund IIIMYI
13.34
USA
3BlackRock Muniyield Quality FundMQY
13.28
USA
4Neuberger Municipal FundNBH
12.81
USA
5Eaton Vance Municipal Bond FundEIM
11.05
USA
6Western Asset Managed Municipals FundMMU
10.49
USA
7Alliancebernstein National Municipal Income FundAFB
6.45
USA
8BlackRock Muniholdings California Quality FundMUC
5.09
USA
9Pimco Municipal Income Fund IIPML
4.74
USA
10Nyli Mackay Definedterm Muni Opportunities FundMMD
3.28
USA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. "In funds" adds up the rows tagged Fund — holdings that are themselves funds this app covers, which is what look-through can expand; a held vehicle that files no holdings of its own (a commodity or currency trust, a money-market fund) is not counted and stays a single line. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Fixed Income Funds

Total Holdings4,078
Effective Holdings8.4
Top 10 Weight97.7%
Max Position17.2%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)98%
Top Country (of Net Assets)98%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Fixed Income Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026.

Benchmark DifferentiationRef: Fixed Income Funds

vs AGGBroad Benchmark
Tracking Error7.1%
Benchmark Correlation0.53
ⓘ Methodology

One sub-card per benchmark: the market primary, then the style secondary — the gap between them is the style sleeve itself. Both anchors are Sparkline-inferred (market from asset class and region, style from the holdings size-and-style map), not the fund's official prospectus benchmark. Solid blue dot marks the fund; the shaded band spans the reference set's 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median (band follows the Peer Universe selector). Active Share compares the fund's book with the benchmark's, share for share; Tracking Error is the annualized daily deviation over the trailing two years (ruler runs to just past the universe's 95th percentile, or past the fund's own figure where that is larger); Benchmark Correlation is the plain daily correlation over the trailing year. Hover the labels for full definitions.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
RTAI
Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF
Peer Group
657 funds
Peer Asset Class
2,838 funds
YTD Return
-9.56%-2.78%3-2.33%2
1Y Return
-8.77%-1.96%3-1.51%3
3Y Return (Ann.)
6.29%4.91%784.80%72
5Y Return (Ann.)
-3.30%-0.25%30.27%4
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
4.59%0.55%10.52%0
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (1,557 share classes across 657 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity84
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Return Corr
FundPeer Group
1ROBAX
Robinson Tax Advantaged Income Fund
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
84---
2XMPT
VanEck CEF Muni Income ETF
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
78---
3MHD
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc.
Fixed Income - Core
Fixed Income - Core
70---
4MQY
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc.
Fixed Income - Core
Fixed Income - Core
70---
5MYI
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc.
Fixed Income - Core
Fixed Income - Core
67---
6NBH
NEUBERGER MUNICIPAL FUND INC.
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
43---
7NAD
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
40---
8VKQ
Invesco Municipal Trust
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
32---
9RFM
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund Inc.
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
32---
10MMU
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc.
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
32---

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days).