© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

NYYY

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Fixed Income Funds · 2,838 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

NYYY

Non-Diversified

xETFs NVDA Daily Income ETF

Expense Ratio
0.99%
AUM
$0M
Inception
5/18/2026
·

The fund invests at least 80% of total assets in cash or cash equivalent securities, including U.S. Treasury securities and short duration fixed-income ETFs, along with financial instruments providing exposure to NVDA. It primarily utilizes total return swaps to replicate NVDA's performance and employs a synthetic covered call strategy to generate current income, selling call options on NVDA with a notional value generally less than 25% of the fund's NAV. The strategy is concentrated in the semiconductors & semiconductor equipment industry.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
NYYY
xETFs NVDA Daily Income ETF
6.9%18.8%36.4%0.42-15.5%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 5/18/2026 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
NYYY
xETFs NVDA Daily Income ETF
5.2%-1.0%3.4%3.0%21.2%5.2%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
YTD
NYYY
xETFs NVDA Daily Income ETF
5.2%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Not enough overlapping history for a regression in this period.
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth).

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund ProfileNon-Diversified

Type
ETF
Asset Class
Fixed Income
Region
Peer Group Benchmark
Peer Group
Fixed Income - Core (657 peers)
Expense Ratio
0.99%
AUM
$0M
Inception
5/18/2026
Holdings (Reported)
4
Non-Diversified
Yes
Equity
0%
Derivatives
-17%
Net Equity Exposure
0%
Strategy Summary

The fund invests at least 80% of total assets in cash or cash equivalent securities, including U.S. Treasury securities and short duration fixed-income ETFs, along with financial instruments providing exposure to NVDA. It primarily utilizes total return swaps to replicate NVDA's performance and employs a synthetic covered call strategy to generate current income, selling call options on NVDA with a notional value generally less than 25% of the fund's NAV. The strategy is concentrated in the semiconductors & semiconductor equipment industry.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the fund's prospectus fee table. Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 6/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 6/30/2026. Strategy summary from the fund's prospectus.

Factor DetailsRef: Fixed Income Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for NYYY — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Fixed Income Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 6/30/2026.

Asset Class Exposure

Fixed Income86.6%
Cash & Short-Term12.5%
Other1.0%
Short positions of 18.0% of net assets are not shown.ⓘ Methodology

Shares of the fund's long book, from the asset category each position is filed under. The long book is 118% of net assets, so shares are of the long book rather than of the fund - it is levered by 18%. The short book is stated under the card and never netted into a slice: a pie cannot draw a negative, and folding a hedge into the class it offsets would make it look like more of that class. Other is everything we could not name as an asset class: holdings the filing itself labels as other, derivative positions at the market value the filing reports rather than at notional, and funds held inside this fund whose own holdings we could not read.

Country Exposure

Level

Based on holdings that carry a country (75% of total assets).

100.0%
100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

4 positions

#NameWeight %Country
1United States OF America - Bureau OF The Public Debt
101.98
USA
2First American Funds
14.67
USA
3-
1.14
N/A
4-
-17.97
N/A
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Fixed Income Funds

Total Holdings4
Effective Holdings1.3
Top 10 Weight117.8%
Max Position102.0%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)118%
Top Country (of Net Assets)100%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Fixed Income Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
NYYY
xETFs NVDA Daily Income ETF
Peer Group
657 funds
Peer Asset Class
2,838 funds
YTD Return
5.20%-2.78%94-2.33%97
1Y Return
---
3Y Return (Ann.)
---
5Y Return (Ann.)
---
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.99%0.55%160.52%13
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (1,557 share classes across 657 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity99
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
FundPeer Group
1YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
Digital Assets - Futures
Digital Assets - Futures
99--
2YETH
Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF
Digital Assets - Futures
Digital Assets - Futures
99--
3COIW
Roundhill COIN WeeklyPay ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
99--
4PLTW
Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
99--
5NFLW
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
99--
6BABW
Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
99--
7GDXW
Roundhill Gold Miners WeeklyPay ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
99--
8GLDW
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
99--
9TSYW
Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF
Options - Bond Income
Options - Bond Income
99--
10TYYY
xETFs TSLA Daily Income ETF
Fixed Income - Core
Fixed Income - Core
99--

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap.