© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

NDMO

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Fixed Income Funds · 2,838 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

NDMO

Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund

AUM
$614M
Inception
8/27/2020
1Y Return
-12.7%1st %ilevs 2,838 asset-class peers
Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
NDMO
Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund
-12.7%-12.7%11.8%-1.40-16.3%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
NDMO
Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund
-9.8%-1.9%-1.9%-10.5%-14.8%-11.9%-12.7%-6.6%2.3%-5.4%-2.7%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
202020212022202320242025YTD
NDMO
Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund
5.3%*12.2%-35.4%7.3%8.3%5.7%-9.8%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
NDMOUS
Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund
-6.8%0.25**0.18*-0.150.030.160.03-0.010.18226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Registrant
Type
ETF
Asset Class
Fixed Income
Region
Peer Group Benchmark
Peer Group
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long (569 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
0
3Y Peer Percentile
12
AUM
$614M
3Y Flow
+1.7%
Inception
8/27/2020
Holdings (Reported)
563
Equity
0%
Derivatives
0%
Net Equity Exposure
0%
ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the prospectus fee table, else the SEC annual shareholder report, else market data. Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 7/31/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 7/31/2026.

Factor DetailsRef: Fixed Income Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for NDMO — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Fixed Income Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 7/31/2026.

Asset Class Exposure

Fixed Income100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares of the fund's long book, from the asset category each position is filed under. The long book is 145% of net assets, so shares are of the long book rather than of the fund - it is levered by 45%.

Country Exposure

Level
100.0%
100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

563 positions (top 10 shown, create for full holdings)

#NameWeight %Country
1Colorado International Center Metropolitan District 8, Adams County, Colorado, Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020
2.57
USA
2Florida Development Finance Corporation, Revenue Bonds, Brightline Florida Passenger Rail Expansion Project, Series 2025B
1.71
USA
3Puerto Rico, GDB Debt Recovery Authority Commonwealth Bonds, Taxable Series 2018
1.59
USA
4Velocity Metropolitan District 5, In the City of Aurora, Colorado, Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A-1
1.57
USA
5Boys Town Village, Nebraska, Revenue Bonds, Boys Town Project Series 2026
1.56
USA
6Geisinger Authority, Montour County, Pennsylvania, Health System Revenue Bonds, Geisinger Health System, Series 2017A-2
1.47
USA
7Port Beaumont Industrial Development Authority, Texas, Facility Revenue Bonds, Jefferson Gulf Coast Energy Project, Series 2021B
1.33
USA
8Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Social Series 2026-153A
1.28
USA
9Dutchess County Local Development Corporation, New York, Revenue Bonds, Health Quest Systems, Inc. Project, Series 2016B
1.24
USA
10New York Transportation Development Corporation, New York, Special Facility Revenue Bonds, American Airlines, Inc. John F Kennedy International Airpor
1.16
USA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Fixed Income Funds

Total Holdings563
Effective Holdings254.2
Top 10 Weight15.5%
Max Position2.6%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)145%
Top Country (of Net Assets)100%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Fixed Income Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 7/31/2026.

Benchmark DifferentiationRef: Fixed Income Funds

vs AGGBroad Benchmark
Tracking Error10.1%
Benchmark Correlation0.47
ⓘ Methodology

One sub-card per benchmark: the market primary, then the style secondary — the gap between them is the style sleeve itself. Both anchors are Sparkline-inferred (market from asset class and region, style from the holdings size-and-style map), not the fund's official prospectus benchmark. Solid blue dot marks the fund; the shaded band spans the reference set's 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median (band follows the Peer Universe selector). Active Share compares the fund's book with the benchmark's, share for share; Tracking Error is the annualized daily deviation over the trailing two years (ruler runs to just past the universe's 95th percentile, or past the fund's own figure where that is larger); Benchmark Correlation is the plain daily correlation over the trailing year. Hover the labels for full definitions.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
NDMO
Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund
Peer Group
569 funds
Peer Asset Class
2,838 funds
YTD Return
-9.79%-4.42%5-2.33%2
1Y Return
-12.65%-3.14%0-1.51%1
3Y Return (Ann.)
2.33%3.02%124.80%5
5Y Return (Ann.)
-5.36%-0.57%10.27%2
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
---
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (1,325 share classes across 569 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity33
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Return Corr
FundPeer Group
1NMCO
Nuveen Municipal Credit Opportunities Fund
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
33---
2NMZ
Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund
Fixed Income - Muni High Yield
Fixed Income - Muni High Yield
33---
3NSAOX
Nuveen Strategic Municipal Opportunities Fund
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
33---
4FLAAX
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
33---
5XMPT
VanEck CEF Muni Income ETF
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
17---
6HYMB
State Street(R) SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
Fixed Income - Muni High Yield
Fixed Income - Muni High Yield
17---
7NVG
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
16---
8NAD
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
14---
9PHMIX
PIMCO High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
Fixed Income - Muni High Yield
Fixed Income - Muni High Yield
13---
10NZF
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
13---

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 7/31/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days).