© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

KMKAX

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Equity Funds · 5,640 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

KMKAX

Non-Diversified

Kinetics Market Opportunities Feeder 1

Expense Ratio
1.65%
AUM
$265M
Inception
2/2/2006
1Y Return
-4.7%6th %ilevs 5,640 asset-class peers
·

The fund invests at least 65% of its net assets in common stocks, convertible securities, warrants, and other equity securities of U.S. and foreign companies involved in capital markets or the gaming industry. It focuses on companies with high operating leverage that can expand capacity with limited costs, including those engaged in public exchanges and investment banking. The fund may also invest in up to 20% of below investment grade debt securities and holds a significant position in the Texas Pacific Land Corporation.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
KMKAX
Kinetics Market Opportunities Feeder 1
-4.7%-4.7%25.2%-0.34-22.1%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
KMKAX
Kinetics Market Opportunities Feeder 1
6.6%-1.9%2.5%-5.4%-6.7%-11.4%-4.7%9.8%24.9%14.8%11.6%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
20062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025YTD
KMKAX
Kinetics Market Opportunities Feeder 1
20.8%*33.5%-55.3%50.5%11.6%-8.1%17.3%46.4%-5.7%-9.3%20.1%46.9%-10.9%22.4%19.3%27.7%14.7%-7.6%83.6%-3.3%6.6%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
KMKAXUS
Kinetics Market Opportunities Feeder 1
-4.0%0.61**-0.050.41*-0.47*0.26-0.33*-0.60**0.22226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund ProfileNon-Diversified

Family
Registrant
Type
Mutual Fund
Asset Class
Equity
Region
Peer Group Benchmark
Peer Group
US Equity (Unclassified) (13 peers)
Expense Ratio
1.65%
5Y Tax Drag
0.32%/yr
AUM
$265M
3Y Flow
+54.7%
Yield
0.10%
Inception
2/2/2006
Holdings (Reported)
1
Non-Diversified
Yes
Turnover
4%
Equity
100%
Derivatives
0%
Net Equity Exposure
100%
Strategy Summary

The fund invests at least 65% of its net assets in common stocks, convertible securities, warrants, and other equity securities of U.S. and foreign companies involved in capital markets or the gaming industry. It focuses on companies with high operating leverage that can expand capacity with limited costs, including those engaged in public exchanges and investment banking. The fund may also invest in up to 20% of below investment grade debt securities and holds a significant position in the Texas Pacific Land Corporation.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the fund's prospectus fee table; tax drag from its after-tax return table. Turnover from the fund's prospectus. Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 6/30/2026. Strategy summary from the fund's prospectus.

Composite Factors

Not scored — KMKAX’s holdings don’t clear the coverage floor for composite factor scores.

Factor DetailsRef: Equity Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for KMKAX — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Equity Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Country Exposure

Level
100.0%
100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

1 position

#NameWeight %Country
1Kinetics Market Opport
100.01
USA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Equity Funds

Total Holdings1
Effective Holdings1
Top 10 Weight100.0%
Max Position100.0%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)100%
Top Country (of Net Assets)100%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Equity Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026.

Benchmark DifferentiationRef: Equity Funds

vs SPYBroad Benchmark
Active Share100.0%
Tracking Error25.0%
Benchmark Correlation0.30
ⓘ Methodology

One sub-card per benchmark: the market primary, then the style secondary — the gap between them is the style sleeve itself. Both anchors are Sparkline-inferred (market from asset class and region, style from the holdings size-and-style map), not the fund's official prospectus benchmark. Solid blue dot marks the fund; the shaded band spans the reference set's 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median (band follows the Peer Universe selector). Active Share compares the fund's book with the benchmark's, share for share; Tracking Error is the annualized daily deviation over the trailing two years (ruler runs to just past the universe's 95th percentile, or past the fund's own figure where that is larger); Benchmark Correlation is the plain daily correlation over the trailing year. Hover the labels for full definitions.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
KMKAX
Kinetics Market Opportunities Feeder 1
Peer Group
13 funds
Peer Region
3,133 funds
Peer Asset Class
5,640 funds
YTD Return
6.56%-12.22%2011.63%26
1Y Return
-4.68%-14.40%314.46%6
3Y Return (Ann.)
24.85%-18.14%9018.47%86
5Y Return (Ann.)
14.81%-8.90%958.64%92
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
1.65%-0.75%40.74%4
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (27 share classes across 13 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Consensus Rank
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Factor Match
Top Return Corr
Top FF Match

Scanning every fund's holdings, factor profile and return history for matches with KMKAX… first view of a fund takes a few seconds.

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of those universe ranks (#1.0 = the top match on every method). A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Consensus Rank is simply the #1 row's figure, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Factor Similarity = 100 − a signature-weighted RMS gap across the composite factor scores (0–100 ranks within the clean equity fund universe), each axis weighted by how far this fund sits from the universe median of 50. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days). Fama-French Similarity = 1/(1+d), where d is the Euclidean distance between factor betas (market, size, value, profitability, investment, momentum, intangible value) from up to three years of daily returns (min 378 daily observations and regression R² of at least 0.25); 1.00 = identical loadings.