© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

FIYY

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Options Funds · 830 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

FIYY

Non-Diversified

GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF

Expense Ratio
1.07%
AUM
$1M
Inception
5/6/2026
·

The fund invests at least 80% of net assets in derivatives contracts referencing an Underlying Leveraged ETF, which aims for 300% of the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. It employs a put write strategy and may utilize a put spread strategy for limited downside protection, with options typically expiring in one month or less. The fund's cash balance may be allocated to various instruments, including U.S. Government securities and money market funds.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
FIYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF
-3.7%-8.6%6.6%-1.83-5.6%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 5/6/2026 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
FIYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF
-3.7%0.0%1.6%-3.5%-1.5%-3.7%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
YTD
FIYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF
-3.7%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Not enough overlapping history for a regression in this period.
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth).

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund ProfileNon-Diversified

Fund Documents(opens the fund company’s site in a new tab)
Type
ETF
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Options
Region
Peer Group
Options - Bond Income (10 peers)
Expense Ratio
1.07%
AUM
$1M
Inception
5/6/2026
Holdings (Reported)
3
Non-Diversified
Yes
Turnover
0%
Equity
-1%
Derivatives
-1%
Net Equity Exposure
0%
Option Notional
5%
Strategy Summary

The fund invests at least 80% of net assets in derivatives contracts referencing an Underlying Leveraged ETF, which aims for 300% of the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. It employs a put write strategy and may utilize a put spread strategy for limited downside protection, with options typically expiring in one month or less. The fund's cash balance may be allocated to various instruments, including U.S. Government securities and money market funds.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the fund's prospectus fee table. Turnover from the SEC annual report (9/4/2026). Yield as of 10/6/2026, AUM 6/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 6/30/2026. Strategy summary from the fund's prospectus.

Factor DetailsRef: Options Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for FIYY — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Options Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/6/2026. AUM as of 6/30/2026.

Asset Class Exposure

Fixed Income54.0%
Other0.1%
Cash & Other (Unreported)46.0%
Short positions of 0.6% of net assets are not shown.ⓘ Methodology

Shares of the fund's long book, from the asset category each position is filed under. N-PORT does not itemise plain balance-sheet cash, so the 46.0% the filing leaves unlisted is shown as an unreported residual rather than assumed away. The short book is stated under the card and never netted into a slice: a pie cannot draw a negative, and folding a hedge into the class it offsets would make it look like more of that class. Other is everything we could not name as an asset class: holdings the filing itself labels as other, derivative positions at the market value the filing reports rather than at notional, and funds held inside this fund whose own holdings we could not read.

Country Exposure

Level
100.0%
100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

3 positions

#NameTickerWeight %Country
1Treasury Bill-
53.98
USA
2Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETFTMF
0.06
USA
3Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETFTMF
-0.62
USA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Options Funds

Total Holdings3
Effective Holdings1
Top 10 Weight54.0%
Max Position54.0%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)54%
Top Country (of Net Assets)54%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Options Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
FIYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF
Peer Group
10 funds
Peer Asset Class
830 funds
YTD Return
-3.68%-3.77%607.62%8
1Y Return
---
3Y Return (Ann.)
---
5Y Return (Ann.)
---
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
1.07%0.59%00.79%8
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (10 share classes across 10 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity87
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
FundPeer Group
1XEY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF
Digital Assets - Futures
Digital Assets - Futures
87--
2BIOY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Biotech ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
87--
3TECY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
87--
4FINY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Financials ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
87--
5XBTY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF
Digital Assets - Futures
Digital Assets - Futures
86--
6MTYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST MSTR ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
84--
7CRY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST CRCL ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
77--
8YBTY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
70--
9COYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
70--
10PLYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST PLTR ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
69--

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap.