© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

FIVY

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Options Funds · 830 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

FIVY

Non-Diversified

Yieldmax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF

Expense Ratio
0.70%
AUM
$5M
·

The fund follows a passive management approach, investing primarily in a portfolio that tracks an index constructed using the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Relative Strength Matrix methodology. It allocates 40% of its assets to the five highest-ranked evaluated securities and 60% to five corresponding YieldMax ETFs, focusing on high-momentum assets identified through relative strength rankings. This strategy aims to provide targeted exposure to select YieldMax ETFs and their underlying securities while generating potential cash distributions.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
FIVY
Yieldmax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF
-5.9%-5.9%31.3%-0.33-32.8%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 6/13/2025 to 6/15/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
FIVY
Yieldmax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF
-6.1%3.4%2.8%11.7%-18.3%-11.3%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 6/15/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
20242025YTD
FIVY
Yieldmax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF
-9.9%*-1.1%-6.1%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 6/15/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
FIVYUS
Yieldmax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF
-45.3%**1.18**-0.09-0.32*-0.83**-0.290.10-0.030.66251
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 6/16/2025 to 6/15/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund ProfileNon-Diversified

Fund Documents(opens the fund company’s site in a new tab)
Registrant
Type
ETF
Asset Class
Peer Asset Class
Options
Region
Equity Sleeve Style
Large Growth
Peer Group Benchmark
Prospectus Benchmark
S And P500 Total Return Index
Peer Group
Options - Income (295 peers)
Expense Ratio
0.70%
AUM
$5M
Holdings (Reported)
73
Non-Diversified
Yes
Turnover
161%
Equity
40%
Derivatives
-6%
Net Equity Exposure
42%
Option Notional
132%
Strategy Summary

The fund follows a passive management approach, investing primarily in a portfolio that tracks an index constructed using the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Relative Strength Matrix methodology. It allocates 40% of its assets to the five highest-ranked evaluated securities and 60% to five corresponding YieldMax ETFs, focusing on high-momentum assets identified through relative strength rankings. This strategy aims to provide targeted exposure to select YieldMax ETFs and their underlying securities while generating potential cash distributions.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the fund's prospectus fee table. Turnover from the SEC annual report (10/7/2025). Yield as of 8/13/2026, AUM 4/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 4/30/2026. Strategy summary from the fund's prospectus.

Equity Size & Style Map

Based on equity exposure only (42% of total assets).

LargeMidSmall
-
-
69%
-
-
31%
-
-
-
Large
ValueCoreGrowth
Size
Large
69%
Mid
31%
Small
0%
Style
Value
0%
Core
0%
Growth
100%
ⓘ Methodology

Equity size and style definitions: Large vs. Small based on market cap, where Large > $70B, Mid $10-70B, and Small < $10B. Value vs. Growth based on percentile ranking on Traditional Value score within the fund's region and size cohort (equal thirds among its true equity-fund peers). This fund is not an equity fund, so the box describes its equity sleeve only (40% of assets): the sleeve's holdings are scored and ranked against equity funds of the same region and size cohort. The rest of the portfolio (bonds, cash, other assets) is not represented here. Cell shading and percentages: share of classified holdings weight per box, from stock-level classification (size on the same $70B/$10B lines; value by Traditional Value terciles across scored stocks). The dot is the average holding ranked against other funds, so dot and weights can differ at the margin. The Size and Style bars are the grid's row and column totals. Holdings as of 4/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Factor DetailsRef: Options Funds

Based on equity exposure only (42% of total assets).

None of the selected metrics are scored for FIVY — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Options Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 4/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 8/13/2026. AUM as of 4/30/2026.

Asset Class Exposure

Equity100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Taken from what this fund IS rather than from what it files. Its exposure is carried in swaps or futures that mark at close to nothing, so the book it reports is the collateral behind them and a pie of that book would describe a margin account. Gearing is not expressed here - a 3x fund reads 100% of its asset class, not 300%. The bucket is the asset the options, futures or swaps REFERENCE, not the collateral behind them: a covered call written on an index is equity exposure even where the filed book is Treasury bills, and a geared fund is read off what it is geared to.

Country Exposure

Level
90.2%
90.2%
9.8%
9.8%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Holdings as of 4/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Sector Exposure

Level

Based on equity exposure only (42% of total assets).

44.9%
24.3%
17.0%
13.7%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the fund's classified holdings — every position we can identify, with cash and unidentified positions excluded — not portfolio weights. Holdings as of 4/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Thematic Exposure

Based on equity exposure only (42% of total assets).

Old vs New Economy

Old Economy13.7%
New Economy86.3%

China Exposure

China/HK Domiciled0.0%
Revenue & Operations0.0%
Operations Only44.9%
Revenue Only0.0%
No Material Exposure55.1%

Company Size

Mega (>$500B)69.2%
Large ($70–500B)0.0%
Mid ($10–70B)30.8%
Small ($1–10B)0.0%
Micro (<$1B)0.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the fund's classified equity book, renormalized so each split sums to 100% (the equity book is 40% of net assets) — they are not portfolio weights. China exposure: domiciled = incorporated in China or Hong Kong, falling back to the filing's country for holdings outside the stock model. Among the rest, revenue = ≥15% of revenue derived from China; operations = ≥3% of LinkedIn-tracked workforce in China, or ≥2 identified Chinese suppliers making up ≥12% of those identified. China revenue is estimated where segment reporting is absent. Company size bands by holding market cap: Mega >$500B, Large $70–500B, Mid $10–70B, Small $1–10B, Micro <$1B. Old vs New Economy partitions Sparkline's 48 industries: New = technology, internet platforms and entertainment, e-commerce, payments, pharma/biotech/medtech, and renewable energy; Old = everything else. Shares are of classified holdings and sum to 100%. China shares are of total equity weight. Size shares are of scored holdings weight. Holdings as of 4/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

11 positions (top 10 shown, create for full holdings) · 57.4% in funds

#NameTickerWeight %SectorIndustryCountry
1YieldMax GOOGL Option Income SGOOY
13.76
--USA
2Yieldmax Tsm Option Income Strategy ETFTSMY
13.22
--USA
3YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETFNVDY
12.34
--USA
4AlphabetGOOGL
10.12
CommunicationInternet PlatformsUSA
5YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETFMRNY
9.91
--USA
6TSMCTSM
9.53
TechnologySemiconductorsTWN
7NvidiaNVDA
9.15
TechnologySemiconductorsUSA
8Yieldmax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETFCRCO
8.16
--USA
9ModernaMRNA
7.08
HealthcareBiotech & Life SciUSA
10Circle Internet GroupCRCL
5.72
FinancialsInvest BankingUSA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. "In funds" adds up the rows tagged Fund — holdings that are themselves funds this app covers, which is what look-through can expand; a held vehicle that files no holdings of its own (a commodity or currency trust, a money-market fund) is not counted and stays a single line. Holdings as of 4/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Options Funds

Total Holdings73
Effective Holdings9.4
Top 10 Weight99.0%
Max Position13.8%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)58%
Top Country (of Net Assets)90%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Options Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 4/30/2026.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
FIVY
Yieldmax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF
Peer Group
295 funds
Peer Asset Class
830 funds
YTD Return
---
1Y Return
---
3Y Return (Ann.)
---
5Y Return (Ann.)
---
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
0.70%0.99%770.79%69
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (329 share classes across 295 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity92
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
FundPeer Group
1NVDY
YieldMax(R) Nvda Option Income Strategy ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
92--
2FEAT
Yieldmax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
90--
3DIPS
YieldMax(R) Short Nvda Option Income Strategy ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
90--
4GOOY
YieldMax(R) Googl Option Income Strategy ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
89--
5MRNY
YieldMax(R) Mrna Option Income Strategy ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
89--
6YMAG
YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
88--
7TSMY
YieldMax(R) Tsm Option Income Strategy ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
88--
8TSLY
YieldMax(R) Tsla Option Income Strategy ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
87--
9FBY
YieldMax(R) Meta Option Income Strategy ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
87--
10CONY
YieldMax(R) Coin Option Income Strategy ETF
Options - Income
Options - Income
87--

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 4/30/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap.