© 2026 Sparkline Capital LP. All rights reserved.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice or a recommendation of any security or fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Methodology |

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

Selection

Selected (1/4)

BATVX

Seeded with the selected fund at 100%

Benchmark

Pick one fund or composite — returns and exposures render in excess of it

Peer Universe

Reference set for percentile ranks and factor bars

Fixed Income Funds · 2,838 total

ANALYTICS
AnalysisScreenerGroups

BATVX

BATS: Short Term Municipal Income Series

AUM
$117M
Inception
5/30/2023
1Y Return
+2.1%83rd %ilevs 2,838 asset-class peers
·

Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in investments the income of which is free from federal income tax and derivatives that provide investment exposure to such securities or to one or more market risk factors associated with such securities.

Time Series
–

Performance

NameCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeMax DD
BATVX
BATS: Short Term Municipal Income Series
2.1%2.1%0.7%-2.33-0.2%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Drag on chart to select period. Sharpe Ratio uses the one-month T-bill as the risk-free rate. From 10/7/2025 to 10/7/2026.

Trailing Returns

Name
YTD1D5D1M3M6M1Y2Y3Y5YMAX
BATVX
BATS: Short Term Municipal Income Series
1.4%0.0%0.0%-0.2%0.2%0.9%2.1%2.5%2.8%3.0%
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. As of 10/7/2026.

Annual Returns

Name
202320242025YTD
BATVX
BATS: Short Term Municipal Income Series
2.4%*3.4%2.8%1.4%
ⓘ Methodology

* partial year — the series ran for only part of it (its first year, or the year it closed); the figure is the return over the part it did run. ETF performance based on market prices. As of 10/7/2026.

Correlation Matrix

Benchmark

Select a second series, or to correlate with the seven research factors.

Factor Regression

Name
Ann. αβ MKTβ SMBβ HMLβ RMWβ CMAβ UMDβ iHMLR²Obs
BATVXUS
BATS: Short Term Municipal Income Series
-1.3%0.00-0.01-0.01-0.010.000.000.000.04226
ⓘ Methodology

ETF performance based on market prices. US factor set. Daily OLS of excess return (fund − T-bill) on factor spread returns over the selected date range, intersected with each series' history. Bold with * |t| ≥ 1.96, ** |t| ≥ 2.58. Cell shading tracks each loading's t-stat. Betas are returns-based — compare with the holdings-based factor scores below. Factor returns are long-short spread returns (© Ken French, Dartmouth). From 10/7/2025 to 8/31/2026.

SnapshotAs ofvsⓘ

Fund Profile

Family
Registrant
Type
Mutual Fund
Asset Class
Fixed Income
Region
Peer Group Benchmark
Peer Group
Fixed Income - Muni Short (72 peers)
1Y Peer Percentile
97
3Y Peer Percentile
31
AUM
$117M
Yield
2.52%
Inception
5/30/2023
Holdings (Reported)
126
Equity
0%
Derivatives
0%
Net Equity Exposure
0%
Strategy Summary

Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in investments the income of which is free from federal income tax and derivatives that provide investment exposure to such securities or to one or more market risk factors associated with such securities.

ⓘ Methodology

Expense ratio and its components from the prospectus fee table, else the SEC annual shareholder report, else market data. Yield as of 10/7/2026, AUM 9/30/2026. Holdings, asset class, style, peer group and exposures as of 6/30/2026. Summary may be from an older prospectus.

Factor DetailsRef: Fixed Income Funds

None of the selected metrics are scored for BATVX — switch the picker to All, or add metrics under Metrics (top right).

ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for factor definitions. Weighted average of underlying company-level values with weights equal to position size. Solid blue dots mark the fund's position within the clean equity fund universe (5th–95th percentile scale); the shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Fixed Income Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026. Expense ratio, yield, and turnover as of 10/7/2026. AUM as of 9/30/2026.

Country Exposure

Level
100.0%
100.0%
ⓘ Methodology

Shares are percentages of the holdings that carry a country, not portfolio weights. Based on N-PORT domicile; ADRs list under their exchange. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

Holdings

See more rows — create a free account▾

126 positions (top 10 shown, create for full holdings)

#NameWeight %Country
1Pittsburgh And Allegheny County Sports & Exhibition Authority (PA)
2.94
USA
2Illinois Finance Authority (IL)
2.37
USA
3Colorado Springs (CO), City OF
2.32
USA
4Nebraska Investment Finance Authority (NE)
2.25
USA
5East Baton Rouge Parish Industrial Development Board Inc (LA)
2.14
USA
6Arizona Board OF Regents (AZ)
2.05
USA
7District OF Columbia Water And Sewer Authority (DC)
2.05
USA
8Oakland University Board OF Trustees (OK)
1.87
USA
9South Carolina Jobs-Economic Dev Auth
1.87
USA
10South Carolina Public Service Authority (SC)
1.87
USA
ⓘ Methodology

Sector, country and factor detail need a security match; the share of weight that matched is a member figure, so the rows without one appear here with those columns blank. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Stock-level data as of 8/31/2026.

ConcentrationRef: Fixed Income Funds

Total Holdings126
Effective Holdings83.6
Top 10 Weight21.8%
Max Position2.9%
Top Sector (of Net Assets)104%
Top Country (of Net Assets)100%
ⓘ Methodology

Hover or click for definitions. Solid blue dots mark the fund: percentage rows on a 0–100% scale, holdings counts log-scaled across the clean-universe 5th–95th percentile range. The shaded band spans the fund's broad class (Fixed Income Funds) 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median. Holdings as of 6/30/2026.

Benchmark DifferentiationRef: Fixed Income Funds

vs AGGBroad Benchmark
Tracking Error4.6%
Benchmark Correlation-0.03
ⓘ Methodology

One sub-card per benchmark: the market primary, then the style secondary — the gap between them is the style sleeve itself. Both anchors are Sparkline-inferred (market from asset class and region, style from the holdings size-and-style map), not the fund's official prospectus benchmark. Solid blue dot marks the fund; the shaded band spans the reference set's 25th–75th percentile, notched at the median (band follows the Peer Universe selector). Active Share compares the fund's book with the benchmark's, share for share; Tracking Error is the annualized daily deviation over the trailing two years (ruler runs to just past the universe's 95th percentile, or past the fund's own figure where that is larger); Benchmark Correlation is the plain daily correlation over the trailing year. Hover the labels for full definitions.

Peer Group Rank

See All Peer Groups
Metric
BATVX
BATS: Short Term Municipal Income Series
Peer Group
72 funds
Peer Asset Class
2,838 funds
YTD Return
1.41%-0.62%97-2.33%87
1Y Return
2.14%-0.04%97-1.51%83
3Y Return (Ann.)
2.84%2.94%314.80%12
5Y Return (Ann.)
---
Expense Ratiohigher = cheaper
---
ⓘ Methodology

Sparkline's own holdings-based peer taxonomy (204 share classes across 72 funds). One share class shown per fund — the exchange-listed class where the SEC series has one, else its longest-history class; percentile ranks and medians are computed against the same deduped set. Quartile chips fill the layer the fund's rank falls in (top layer = best quartile). Funds without a full return history rank only on the horizons they cover.

Similar Funds

See more rows — create a free account▾

Nearest funds across the whole universe, by holdings and behavior — the peer taxonomy is ignored, so matches can come from any category.

Top Similarity84
Top Overlap
Top Active Tilt
Top Return Corr
FundPeer Group
1TFCAX
SIMT Tax-Free Conservative Income Fund
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
84---
2NUSMX
Nuveen Ultra Short Municipal Managed Accounts Portfolio
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
38---
3EXFLX
Eaton Vance National Ultra-Short Municipal Income Fund
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
23---
4VWSTX
VANGUARD ULTRA-SHORT-TERM TAX-EXEMPT FUND
Fixed Income - Muni Short
Fixed Income - Muni Short
17---
5MEAR
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
14---
6ORSTX
Invesco Short Term Municipal Fund
Fixed Income - Muni Short
Fixed Income - Muni Short
10---
7EXNAX
Eaton Vance National Limited Maturity Municipal Income Fund
Fixed Income - Muni Short
Fixed Income - Muni Short
4---
8PVI
Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
Fixed Income - Muni Intermediate/Long
4---
9EVSM
Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
Fixed Income - Muni Short
Fixed Income - Muni Short
2---
10FUMB
First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF
Fixed Income - Muni Short
Fixed Income - Muni Short
2---

The method columns are members-only — create a free account to see these figures.

ⓘ Methodology

Rows are the consensus top matches (a fund must place in at least two methods' top 250 to qualify, and matches missing more than one of this fund's own methods are not ranked — a row scored on fewer methods is a noisier estimate, not a better match). Click a method column to see that method's own top matches across the whole universe instead. Gray (N) beside each method's metric is that fund's rank in the whole universe on that method. Similarity is a percentile among match-grade fund pairs, 0–100 — 87 means the pair is closer than 87% of the strongest matches in the universe, averaged across the methods — so it compares across funds: index clones tie at the top with thousands of other clone pairs, so scores top out in the high 80s to 90s, while a one-of-a-kind fund's best match can score in the 30s. Rows are ordered by the Consensus Rank — the geometric mean of those universe ranks, shown in each cell's tooltip — and the score is held down the list to the level of the closest match above it, so equal scores mean equally close and the number reads as a floor. A dash means that method has no figure for the pair at all (one of them lacks the holdings or return history it needs). Hover a column header for each method's definition. The “Top…” strips above compare against every fund's own top match across the whole universe (they deliberately don't follow the Peer Universe selector); Top Similarity is simply the best match's score, with no reference band; the Holdings and Active Tilt strips carry no reference band because computing every fund's best book overlap would require a full holdings scan per fund — the dot stands alone on its natural 0–100% scale. One share class shown per fund, and a fund's own sister share classes are excluded from its Top-match strips. Holdings as of 6/30/2026. Consensus Rank is the geometric mean of the match's universe-wide rank across the methods (#1.0 = top match on every one). Holdings Overlap = common-holdings weight (sum of the minimum weight across shared positions, long only). Active Tilt Overlap = the same statistic on active weights (holdings minus the fund's own default benchmark, floored at 0), which strips the benchmark ballast that dominates raw overlap. Return Correlation = correlation of market-hedged daily returns over the trailing two years (CAPM residuals), so only market-beta co-movement is removed; requires ~18 months of daily history (378 of the window's 504 trading days).